The board delved into the intricacies of installing four pickleball courts, considering various factors such as surface materials, trail access, restroom facilities, and parking logistics. A member provided insights into the cost analysis between potential vendors, Sports and Outdoor Specialties, noting the competitive nature of the bids, which were within a close 10-15% range. With an area of approximately 51,000 square feet earmarked for development, the board weighed the pros and cons of asphalt versus concrete surfaces. Asphalt was identified as a more economical choice, with historical reference to the long-lasting basketball court installed in the 1990s.

A significant portion of the discussion was dedicated to the ancillary facilities accompanying the courts. The board debated the merits of installing a trail, with considerations between concrete pavers and traditional asphalt paths, priced at approximately $42,000. The importance of these trails was not only aesthetic but also related to compliance with potential grant requirements. When addressing restroom facilities, the board considered portable toilets as an interim solution while acknowledging the long-term benefits of permanent structures. Parking challenges were also highlighted, particularly for tournament events, with suggestions to utilize a nearby dirt parking lot for overflow needs.

The funding strategy for the pickleball project included potential grants from the Department of Natural Resources and community fundraising initiatives. The board discussed creating a 401(c)(3) organization to streamline fundraising efforts, drawing inspiration from the Cross Lake pickleball association’s successful $70,000 fundraising campaign. Additionally, the idea of incorporating wind screens on fencing for advertising revenue was proposed, potentially generating income through annual fees from local businesses.

Maintenance costs and the impact on the parks budget were another focal point of the discussion. The board examined potential maintenance needs, emphasizing routine tasks such as trash collection and court cleaning while indicating that substantial repairs might be infrequent. Comparisons were made to existing basketball courts to anticipate a similar low-maintenance requirement, although some members urged caution to ensure financial sustainability.

The meeting also touched upon the broader need for a master plan to secure grant funding more effectively. Participants agreed that a plan would enhance their chances of obtaining support by presenting a clear vision to potential donors and grantors. The board discussed engaging professional grant writers to aid in understanding and meeting funding requirements, emphasizing the necessity of careful preparation for successful outcomes.

In addition to the pickleball project, the meeting addressed the need for cohesive city signage. The board proposed creating a unified aesthetic that incorporates the existing city logo with local features. The discussion included potential design options, material durability, and the introduction of QR codes for enhanced engagement. The cost estimates for new signage ranged from a few hundred to a couple of thousand dollars, depending on the materials chosen.

Staff updates included the arrival of new snowshoe route signs and ongoing discussions about sledding hills. The board noted that sledding hills often designate themselves naturally, but emphasized the need for improved communication regarding available amenities. The board expressed a desire to enhance community awareness through updated communication strategies, including leveraging events like Aviation Day to engage residents.

Finally, the meeting reviewed the community garden initiative, noting high interest in plot reservations. The board collaborated with a local community college to design promotional materials and planned a mandatory meeting for gardeners to discuss rules and practices. The meeting concluded with acknowledgments of the local arboretum’s efforts in developing recreational opportunities.