Brevard County Commission Faces Public Outcry Over Board Appointments and CRAs

During the recent Brevard County Commission meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to board appointments and the use of public funds in Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRAs). The commission also delved into a variety of topics, such as hurricane damage funding, fire rescue workshop discussions, and cultural event support, amidst public scrutiny over governance practices.

23:25The most notable issue arose from the appointment of Marcus Herman and Andrew Connor to various boards, sparking significant public dissent. Residents expressed concerns about Herman’s extensive tenure on the board, with claims that he has served for nearly 20 years. Speakers highlighted that Herman was not listed among applicants for open positions on three citizen advisory boards, despite a county email indicating the search for new applicants. Critics argued against waiving term limits for Herman. The debate intensified with references to Herman’s past involvement in incorporation efforts, which some residents opposed, fearing increased taxes and regulation.

Andrew Connor’s appointment to the Tourism Development Council also faced backlash. Public commenters questioned his qualifications due to his background in health insurance rather than tourism, alongside allegations of election interference in Titusville, which they feared could undermine public trust. Kevin Jeffrey emphasized these controversies, urging the commission to reconsider Connor’s appointment to preserve the county’s integrity. The public’s persistence in referencing a 2022 ordinance on term limits highlighted their frustration over perceived stagnation and concentration of power within the boards.

41:44The scrutiny extended to Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRAs), with Diana Scher and Diane Lair voicing concerns over the allocation of public funds to private businesses. Scher criticized the diversion of over $7 million from the general fund to support CRAs, arguing that these funds could be better utilized for essential services. Despite some defense of CRAs’ contributions to local projects, Scher remained firm in her stance against public money supporting private endeavors. Lair echoed doubts about the community benefits from CRAs, calling for a shift in focus to essential services.

1:00:24In response to public comments, the commission engaged in discussions surrounding other agenda items. A proposal was approved for the protection of a manhole with public utility work, and a report on the State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) was presented. This program, which supports affordable housing through $2.6 million in funding, was unanimously approved. The commission’s focus then shifted to the financial challenges posed by hurricane damage to park lands, with a $2.3 million repair cost. A motion was passed to expedite funding through unanticipated balances, reducing potential delays.

1:19:34The commission also addressed the scheduling of a workshop on fire rescue issues, which became a point of contention due to ongoing negotiations with the firefighters’ union. The county attorney clarified legal constraints, emphasizing that certain discussions could lead to violations of collective bargaining agreements. Despite calls for public dialogue on fire services, the workshop was ultimately canceled due to these legal implications. Commissioners expressed a commitment to maintaining transparency and public engagement within the bounds of legal frameworks.

1:00:24Cultural support was another topic of discussion of the meeting, with the commission acknowledging the Bard Renaissance Fair and its contributions to the community. Organizers expressed gratitude for the commission’s backing, highlighting the event’s role in providing entertainment and educational opportunities.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: