Jack Kitchen’s application involved two distinct variance requests. The first was to reduce the side setback from 7.5 feet to 5.5 feet, allowing for an open-air covered area featuring a column at the reduced distance. The second request sought to reduce the front setback requirement from 20 feet to 10 feet for an accessory building designed to store a boat, due to the unusual shape of the lot at the end of the cul-de-sac.

Victor Watson, Kitchen’s attorney, presented the application and referenced letters of support from neighboring residents. However, the board members sought comprehensive details about the project. Dr. Bass inquired about the construction history of the existing structure, which Kitchen clarified had been rebuilt in 2019 after the original house, dating back to the late 1970s or early 1980s, fell into disrepair. Further questions from Dr. Bass focused on whether similar structures in the neighborhood had received variances or were constructed without approval. Kitchen admitted uncertainty but emphasized the necessity of the variances due to the lot’s unique configuration.

The board also scrutinized the notification process for adjacent property owners. Kitchen confirmed he had spoken to several neighbors, who expressed no opposition, although he acknowledged that not all required parties might have been notified due to difficulties in reaching them.

Ultimately, after thorough questioning and deliberations, the board members weighed the implications of the variances against community standards and zoning laws. They unanimously approved the variances, recognizing the special conditions of Kitchen’s property and concluding that the adjustments would not detract from the neighborhood’s integrity.

Another topic involved a proposal for a standalone garage. The board sought specifics on the project, including diagrams or CAD drawings. The applicant explained the unique characteristics of the property, which consisted of separated parcels and required a new design plan due to a survey revealing the actual setbacks.

Legal staff confirmed compliance with existing codes, reading from Section 62-2116, which outlines criteria for building permits and setback requirements for parcels divided by public rights-of-way. The application was approved unanimously, with conditions referencing the survey dated July 12, 2024, as the proposed garage was determined to improve the neighborhood.

The meeting also covered a variance request from Danny and Esther Clayton Redmond for wall height in the front setback of their property. John Campbell, representing the applicants, had not been sworn in due to arriving late and lacked proper documentation. Consequently, the board postponed the discussion to the next meeting on September 18.

Lastly, Randolph and Jillian Torres sought a variance for an accessory structure, but no representative was present. The board debated whether to deny or postpone the application, ultimately deciding to postpone the matter to the next meeting.