0:00The primary focus of the meeting was the application by Icon Keystone NJP 4 to amend the site plan for the property on Route 22. The proposal involved demolishing a deteriorating office space, unused since 2019, to replace it with landscaping and a sidewalk. John Marora represented the applicant, with Tony Dian from Kimley Horn and Frank Aleso of Link Logistics providing testimony. Aleso emphasized that the office space had been vacant since their acquisition and highlighted the need for demolition to prevent further deterioration. Aleso stated, “We would install some green space to make it the curb appeal for the neighborhood.”

20:57The board engaged in discussions about the demolition process, including the potential presence of asbestos, which could delay proceedings. The applicant assured the board that any hazardous materials would be properly abated, with adherence to state regulations regarding air quality during demolition. The board also addressed concerns about truck traffic and noise, particularly during peak times like the Christmas season. Aleso clarified that typically 5 to 10 trucks visit daily, with some increase expected during peak periods, but assured that no significant traffic increase was anticipated from the demolition.

The conversation extended to the implications of the demolition on the visibility and aesthetics of the remaining structure. The board sought clarity on the landscaping plans, questioning whether the new trees would integrate with existing vegetation and whether they would be deciduous or evergreen. It was confirmed that landscaping improvements were planned to enhance the property’s visual appeal, with additional vegetation to camouflage the remaining structure.

Public comments included concerns from a resident, Vince O’Brien, about trucks using his dead-end street for deliveries, which had led to disruptions. In response, planning representatives acknowledged the possibility of erecting signage to prevent such occurrences. O’Brien also voiced concerns about historical landscaping maintenance, and the representatives committed to investigating and addressing these issues.

39:43The board delved into broader discussions about the site’s use, particularly regarding warehousing and storage operations. The property operates as a pre-existing non-conforming use under current zoning laws, allowing it to continue despite changes in zoning definitions. A representative from the operations, identified as Linart, explained that their logistics model involves moving goods to retailers or wholesalers within a six-month period, contrasting with prior operations that focused on book distribution.

Concerns were raised about potential light pollution from truck operations, especially during evening hours, and the adequacy of existing landscaping to buffer light and noise. The board explored the potential impacts of late-night operations on nearby residential properties, emphasizing the importance of balancing business interests with protections for residents. This included discussions about possible township ordinances to limit operational hours if they became problematic.

1:21:01The board also addressed issues related to outdoor storage, expressing apprehension about unregulated storage becoming a problem. They stressed the need for designated storage areas to prevent clutter and pollution, with the applicant agreeing to confine outdoor storage to a specified canopied area.

1:39:04As the meeting concluded, the board deliberated on the proposed conditions for approving the site plan, which included engaging with GPS mapping services to ensure accurate directions to the site and conducting site walks to identify potential issues with headlight intrusion on neighboring properties. The board also emphasized the importance of maintaining air quality during demolition and committed to overseeing the proper management of hazardous materials.