0:02The committee devoted considerable attention to the budget development strategies for the upcoming year, focusing on ways to enhance revenue while containing costs. The proposed budget cut at the high school level was a prominent topic, with a discussion on its potential impact on staffing and course offerings. The anticipated reduction was expected to primarily affect administrative and clerical positions, with an emphasis on minimizing the impact on positions directly involved with students. Presenters noted that despite efforts to protect “student-facing” roles, the cut would likely necessitate adjustments in course offerings and class sizes, compounded by a projected enrollment decrease of about 40 students in the coming year.

Committee members expressed concern over whether these adjustments might lead to a return to overcrowded classrooms, a scenario experienced two years prior. They also discussed maintaining the “four plus one” teaching model, which balances teacher workloads while supporting student needs.

17:45In addition to staffing, the committee delved into the sectioning process for classes. While the administration was generally satisfied with enrollment numbers in honors and Advanced Placement classes, some advanced classes did not meet expected enrollment figures, resulting in smaller class sizes. This led to a clarification that the committee had not mandated a reduction in class sizes to historic levels, as was previously misunderstood.

34:33The need for effective supervision and support for the department, given its size and the high number of students with Individualized Education Plans (IEPs), was emphasized. A joint position, where an assistant head of school also serves as the director of special education, was highlighted as crucial for ensuring collaboration across educational levels.

Athletics funding was another important topic, with the department facing a $100,000 budget cut. Despite a reported 22% increase in student participation since FY23, driven by financial support from a recent override, the department struggled with facility constraints and safety considerations. A proposal to increase user fees was introduced as a potential solution to offset the budget shortfall and sustain the growing demand for athletic programs.

52:46The committee also explored the management of the Metco Grant, which supports materials, supplies, and staffing for Metco students. Concerns were raised about the allocation of these funds, especially in light of recent strict guidelines from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. The necessity of transparency in the grant’s utilization was emphasized, given Brookline’s status as the second-largest Metco district.

1:29:48Financial challenges extended beyond individual programs, as the committee confronted a broader projected budget deficit of $59,000. Discussions revealed a reliance on accumulated fund balances, possibly bolstered by federal grants during the COVID-19 period. However, caution was urged against depending on one-time revenue sources for ongoing expenses. The committee expressed determination to address the deficit without resorting to reserve fund transfers.

Public comments underscored community concerns about the potential impacts of budget cuts on essential programs. Speakers advocated for continued investment in equity and support for at-risk students, emphasizing the broader benefits of such initiatives. Concerns about the implications of budget cuts on school-funded sports and music programs were voiced by both community members and students, urging the committee to consider alternatives that would preserve these vital educational components.

0:02The meeting concluded with the unanimous acceptance of two significant gifts: an anonymous $5,000 donation for the ACE scholarship fund and a $300 contribution to the Parent Child Plus program. However, the vote on a $115,000 Metco grant was deferred pending additional information.