The most pressing topic centered on a proposed ordinance to amend city code related to the Cannon Valley Fair, with debate over the types of events allowed. Many residents voiced strong opposition to motorized activities, citing noise concerns, particularly from events like demolition derbies and motocross. These concerns were echoed during a recent fair board meeting, where the potential reduction in the frequency of such events and their reclassification were discussed. The enforceability of noise standards emerged as a contentious issue, with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) typically working with industries on noise mitigation strategies. However, implementing such measures for loud vehicle events was deemed challenging.

The discussion also delved into the fair’s core purpose, with some commissioners emphasizing the need to focus on agriculture and community events, rather than expanding to include motorized activities and concerts. Suggestions were made to eliminate motorized events outside the main fair dates, allowing for traditional events on Memorial Day and Labor Day. Yet, the Planning Commission faced the challenge of defining the fair’s scope without overstepping its role, with some members arguing for the fair’s autonomy in determining its events, provided they adhere to relevant codes.

Additionally, the notion of a permitting process akin to past street dances downtown was proposed, alongside a pre-approved list of events each year. While this could streamline processes, events would still need to comply with zoning regulations, particularly given the residential zoning of the fairgrounds. The discussion touched on the complexities of interim use permits, with concerns about the lengthy public hearing process required even for small events.

Further complicating matters, residents expressed opposition to noise and aesthetic issues associated with fairground activities, such as motorized racing and outdoor storage. There was a call for the fair board to explore alternative fundraising methods beyond motorized events, with suggestions for quieter events like a “Renaissance fair.” Despite the fair board’s efforts to monitor noise, recent experiences with events like monster truck shows revealed their unsuitability due to excessive noise levels.

The potential establishment of a new zoning designation specifically for the fairgrounds was another major topic. This change would necessitate significant amendments to current zoning regulations to maintain the area as R2. Concerns were raised about codifying the fair’s activities into city regulations, with apprehension that it could grant the fair undue freedom. To address stability concerns, a proposal emerged for a supermajority council vote for any future ordinance changes.

Legal distinctions between agricultural societies and fair associations were discussed, highlighting that fair associations lack state exemptions from local zoning laws. This legal framework requires the city to retain regulatory oversight, particularly for activities outside the main fair. The importance of community input was emphasized, recognizing the need for a comprehensive understanding of both the fair’s historical activities and current community sentiments before designating the fairgrounds as a specific district.

The discussion also stressed the importance of integrating community input into the planning process. A proposal was made to establish a buffer zone of 350 feet from affected parcels, accompanied by a collaborative work session involving representatives from the community and the fair. This session would provide a platform for stakeholders to express their interests and concerns directly, deemed essential for a fair resolution.

Logistical considerations for the timeline of implementing any new ordinance were also discussed. A decision is needed by February to ensure everything is in place by March, crucial for the fair’s operations. The formation of a stakeholder group was proposed, consisting of representatives from the planning commission, community, and fair, with the potential inclusion of city council members.

Towards the end of the meeting, discussions highlighted the complexities of permitting activities for various events, particularly those involving churches and the Fair Board. The need for objective, measurable criteria to evaluate permit requests was emphasized to avoid arbitrary decisions, referencing past incidents that led to legal challenges, including a case reaching the Minnesota State Supreme Court.