The most significant topic of the evening was the proposed text amendment to permit motorized cart racing in the Urban Reserve (UR) zone, affecting all designated green areas on the official zoning map. This proposal would require the Cannon Valley Fair to apply for a conditional use permit, granting the Planning Commission and City Council authority to impose conditions regarding noise, hours of operation, and traffic. The public hearing saw a diverse range of opinions, with residents and fair representatives voicing their views.

A representative from the Cannon Valley Fair began by emphasizing the need for the conditional use permit and addressing concerns about noise. They highlighted that the racetrack had been successfully run in Wisconsin and that noise levels were manageable, stating, “we were within 150 ft of the track and we could carry conversation.” The representative assured that races would end by 10:00 PM and committed to installing mufflers on the loudest racing carts.

Despite these assurances, numerous residents voiced their opposition. Julie Anderson expressed concerns about the long-term planning of Cannon Falls, questioning the impact of the racetrack on property values and the community’s financial resources. Another resident, Jan Fener, read a letter from a neighbor, highlighting prior noise complaints and the potential for future expansion of motorized activities. Kurt Bisil raised issues about higher-powered sprint carts being allowed to race and emphasized the need for an environmental review to assess potential adverse impacts on the community.

The commission’s discussion acknowledged the fair’s financial struggles and the need for new revenue sources. However, members expressed concerns about setting a precedent for future zoning exceptions. One member feared a “snowballing effect,” where allowing the racetrack could lead to additional requests for exemptions in other Urban Reserve areas. The commission emphasized the importance of considering the long-term benefits for Cannon Falls residents rather than addressing a singular issue.

The debate also touched on the fair’s operational governance and its relationship with the Agricultural Society. Questions were raised about the fair’s classification and whether it fell under city zoning regulations. Members noted that the fair had historically operated with a degree of autonomy, raising issues about the fairness and clarity of past understandings between the fair and the city.

The commission recognized the need for more discussions in a private setting to find amicable solutions. However, the urgency of making a decision due to the impending end of the racing season was also noted. Ultimately, a motion was made to deny the text amendment as written, with the commission recommending this denial to the city council. The next steps involve presenting this recommendation at the city council meeting, where the final decision will be made.

Another topic discussed was the lot split proposal for Artisan Plaza. The owner sought to split off approximately 26,000 square feet of property along Fourth Street. Zach Logelin, a city official, reported that the county had approved access with pending stipulations that the owner agreed to meet. The new lot would conform to the B2 zoning standards, and the owner committed to adding ten new parking spaces to maintain compliance. The commission expressed curiosity regarding the timing of the request, given that the actual development was years away.

Concerns were raised about the implications of the driveway for the newly split properties, particularly regarding access if one of the parcels were sold. Kevin acknowledged that moving the driveway would be necessary if he decided to sell one of the lots. The commission discussed the importance of having a legal agreement to ensure future access would not become an issue. Despite concerns, Kevin maintained that he had adhered to city regulations and guidelines, asserting that there should be no reason to deny the lot split request. The commission ultimately approved the lot split, contingent on the conditions discussed.

The meeting also addressed a text amendment proposal regarding Bethel Rock Church, which aimed to allow religious institutions to operate within the B2 General Business District via a conditional use permit. The lead pastor of the church advocated for the amendment, emphasizing the church’s role in community engagement and social services. The pastor presented letters of support from local business owners and referenced legal cases where religious institutions were granted equal standing in commercial districts.

However, concerns were raised about the financial implications of zoning changes, particularly regarding tax revenue essential for maintaining city services. The commission discussed whether to allow religious organizations in the B2 zone, noting that other communities permit such uses. Legal counsel explained that any organization would need to demonstrate its status as a legitimate religious entity.