The public input segment was dominated by discussions surrounding the proposed data center, with residents voicing strong opposition and concerns over its environmental and economic impact. Carrie Lundine initiated the discourse, expressing skepticism about how the data center would serve corporate interests over local needs. She voiced apprehension about the substantial water and energy consumption required for the data center’s operation, which could lead to a reduction in the aquifer’s water level, affecting local wells. Lundine also feared the noise and light pollution that could disrupt the quiet, rural lifestyle of Cannon Falls.

Jeff Weekes followed Lundine, echoing concerns over transparency and the lack of information provided by the data center’s representatives. He emphasized the need for the council to address community questions adequately and warned of the difficulties residents might face in challenging such a large entity. Alyssa Jacobs, a local farmer, stressed the potential strain on water resources and its impact on agriculture.

She called for a halt to the project until all concerns were addressed and questioned the city’s preparedness for potential project abandonment. Anna Lindall further pressed for clarity on water usage caps and infrastructure capabilities, warning that unresolved issues could lead to legal actions by concerned citizens.

The council’s response included a commitment to provide detailed information during an upcoming work session, where council members could engage directly with the developer. The proposed water usage cap for the data center was set at 43 million gallons annually after a decade, with conditions for its irrigation well use requiring approval from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Noise pollution was another point of concern, with assurances that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) would enforce noise regulations and require mitigation if necessary.

Energy consumption and potential financial burdens on residents were also addressed. The council emphasized that the developer would cover upfront costs for necessary infrastructure improvements. The priority of residential over industrial users in power allocation was confirmed, mitigating fears of power outages due to the data center’s demands.

Additionally, the council clarified that public funds would not subsidize the data center, and there was no request for tax increment financing (TIF). A park dedication fee of $494,000 was cited, with ongoing discussions regarding contributions to the local school district.

The meeting also covered a proposed referendum by the Board of Independent School District Number 252, seeking to increase per-pupil funding by $950, subject to inflation adjustments. The referendum, if passed, would result in a property tax increase, with potential consequences including staffing cuts and increased class sizes if not approved. This highlighted the broader issue of financial constraints faced by the district and the community’s role in supporting educational needs.

Routine administrative items were also addressed, including updates on public works projects, health insurance renewals, and library board activities. The Economic Development Authority reported progress on infrastructure projects and successful collaboration with local farmers for crop removal.