The primary topic of discussion revolved around the proposed changes to the fee structures for the city’s parks and recreation services. The board engaged in an extensive review of differential fee structures, which aim to recognize various community contributors, including residents, non-residents, veterans, and seniors. The need for a nuanced approach was underscored by the limitations imposed by grants such as the Florida Public Lands grant (FERDAP), which restricts the ability to charge differential fees once accepted.

The proposal focused on simplifying the fee structure to reduce confusion and enhance customer experience. A suggestion was made to implement discounts, especially for seniors and veterans, and to consider a simplified structure that delineates between resident and non-resident seniors. Board members acknowledged the complexities involved in managing numerous categories and the potential financial implications for facilities, particularly if too many discounts are applied.

Specific fee amounts were mentioned, such as a $36 monthly dual court pass and a $336 annual pass, designed to encourage longer memberships over single-day visits. The board debated the merits of offering a simplified structure with an all-access pass. Concerns about pricing and the challenges faced by some users, like Canadian visitors paying in coins, highlighted the need for a coherent and user-friendly system.

The board also voted to seek legal clarification on a matter concerning communications from third-party health care providers involved in the city’s reimbursement program. Members expressed unease over certain contractual demands and sought advice from the city attorney to determine the legality and fairness of these requirements. This motion was unanimously supported by the board.

In addition to the fee structure discussions, the meeting covered various city projects and updates. The board celebrated the approval of a tennis court bid slightly below the budgeted amount, with hopes for project completion by October. However, concerns were raised about potential scheduling conflicts with a similar project in Cocoa Beach slated for the same timeframe.

The status of the splash pad project was addressed, noting significant delays due to inadequate initial design and implementation. Re-engineering efforts are underway, with estimated repairs costing $134,000. The board acknowledged the absence of recourse against the original installers, as the company is no longer operational in its previous form.

The board also discussed the concession stand project, which is moving forward with a new design that includes air conditioning units for staff comfort. The project is anticipated to cost under $20,000, lower than previous estimates exceeding $350,000.

Lastly, the board introduced a new system for distributing city council meeting agendas, allowing residents to subscribe for direct updates. Upcoming city council vacancies and the budget process were also highlighted, emphasizing the importance of community involvement.