A central point of the meeting was the presentation by coastal engineer Wendy Laurent from Taylor Engineering, who shared insights from a comprehensive study on the local beach’s ecosystem, emphasizing its importance for storm hazard protection and recreation. Laurent’s study, which involved historical data analysis, highlighted that the beach has retained sand over the long term, a positive outcome for tourism and storm protection. However, she acknowledged that further investigation into storm events and their effects on beach dynamics is necessary for more effective coastal management.

The committee engaged in a discussion about the elevation and slope of the beach berm, noting that the berm’s elevation has increased from 7 feet in 1994 to 8 feet in 2023 due to nourishment efforts. Concerns were raised about steepening profiles along the berm edge, which may pose safety risks, particularly for children. The committee explored the possibility of reshaping the beach to maintain a safe slope while still meeting storm protection requirements. This conversation included considerations of sediment grain size, sea level rise, and wave patterns as potential factors influencing the beach’s slope.

The dialogue also delved into the role of the Army Corps’ beach nourishment template and natural coastal processes in shaping the beach’s profile. Discussions highlighted the need for comprehensive modeling studies to better understand the interplay between nourishment efforts and natural processes, with a focus on maintaining both safety and infrastructure protection. The potential for reshaping existing sand rather than adding new sand was discussed as a cost-effective strategy for improving slope safety without compromising storm protection.

Further discussions centered around the collaboration between local government and federal entities, specifically the Army Corps of Engineers and Congressman Van Drew’s office. The committee emphasized the importance of Cape May taking the initiative to develop a feasible project proposal, which could expedite federal involvement and funding. Historical context was provided through references to previous beach nourishment plans from 1989 and 1991.

The committee recognized the necessity of proactive engagement with Congress and the Army Corps to secure resources for future nourishment projects. Discussions included the potential reauthorization of current projects and the importance of communicating effectively with legislative leaders to advocate for beach preservation. A smaller team was proposed to engage with stakeholders to outline priorities and establish acceptable modeling templates, influencing project costs and feasibility.

Lastly, the meeting touched on the challenges of obtaining permits for city-funded beach reshaping projects and the importance of securing authorization from the Army Corps. The committee plans to finalize a report to present to the city council, which will include data and profiles of the beach before and after replenishment. This report aims to provide a thorough overview to support future project proposals.