Cape May City Council Discusses Recycling Ordinance Changes and Preservation Efforts

The Cape May City Council held a discussion on March 18, 2025, regarding revisions to the city’s recycling practices and explored various resolutions, including those related to preservation grants and infrastructure improvements, during their meeting at City Hall Auditorium.

1:34:42The most prominent topic of the meeting was the proposed amendment to the city’s recycling ordinance, which aims to address challenges faced by the Department of Public Works (DPW) and align the city’s practices with current market conditions. The discussion was comprehensive, with council members examining the proposed changes that would allow property owners to transport excess recycling materials to a municipal recycling station on Canning House Lane. This adjustment reflects a broader national trend of municipalities reevaluating their recycling strategies in response to evolving market conditions and operational capacity issues. A council member noted the widespread nature of these challenges, referencing historical practices and the shift in recycling markets.

0:28The council emphasized the importance of the ordinance, which would maintain the provision of two 96-gallon cans for homeowners while setting limits on recycling collection for commercial properties. These changes aim to strike a balance between service provision and the city’s logistical capabilities.

1:34:42In addition to the recycling ordinance, the council addressed resolution 552-2022, amending metered parking zones and fees. The public hearing elicited no comments, and the ordinance received approval through a roll call vote. The council also considered ordinance 553-2024, a bond ordinance for $2,200,000 intended to fund city projects. Similar to the parking ordinance, the bond’s public hearing saw no participation, but it was approved following a council member’s reminder of the initiative’s unanimous support.

Another resolution discussed was the non-binding letter of intent with the Mid-Atlantic Center for the Arts (MAC) concerning a bond and reimbursement plan for improvements to the Emlyn Physick Estate. The city solicitor clarified that the non-binding nature of the agreement was necessary until the bond sale was finalized, approximately 20 days after the ordinance’s passage.

1:51:20During public comment, Stacy Shan raised inquiries regarding resolution 12203, which pertains to Convention Hall’s roof repairs. She questioned the necessity of repairs on a relatively new metal roof, especially as the city continues to pay off the building’s loan. It was explained that the roof required additional work due to insufficient gutter capacity, necessitating the replacement of existing gutters with larger ones to manage water flow effectively.

Shan also questioned resolution 1233, a preservation grant intended to encourage small businesses in mixed neighborhoods near the Acme parking lot. Her concerns centered on the lack of expansion in the targeted area. The council acknowledged the grant’s focus on community investment and job creation while recognizing the limitations of eligible businesses in the area.

Jules Rous from New York Avenue raised concerns about the bidding process for city projects, emphasizing the importance of competitive pricing evaluations. The council clarified that resolution 135 regarding emergency temporary budget appropriations was mainly to cover bills during the extended first-quarter budget adoption timeline.

2:07:06The meeting concluded with various council members expressing appreciation for recent community events and public works efforts. Councilwoman Baldwin praised the mayor’s blessing of the waters event, while Council member Bodner thanked the DPW for their work during a recent storm. Deputy Mayor McDade highlighted the passage of a resolution to engage with Decker for short-term rental compliance, and Council member Meyer urged residents to keep astronauts’ safe return in their thoughts, emphasizing the significance of their mission.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: