01:15:51The resolution highlighted concerns that funds already awarded for preservation were reportedly being withheld, posing a threat to ongoing and future projects. Members expressed the need to protect and preserve Cape May’s historic character, which is vital to the town’s identity and cultural heritage.

49:39In a related discussion, the commission considered the impact of a proposed renovation by McFarland Associates on Madison Avenue. The representatives outlined plans to convert a second-floor rear porch into an enclosed bathroom, with materials chosen to match the existing structure. Concerns were raised about the potential need for a floor area ratio (FAR) analysis due to the changes in usable space. The commission granted conceptual approval, pending resolution of zoning concerns and submission of a south elevation drawing for review. This approach aimed to streamline the renovation process while ensuring compliance with preservation standards.

19:00Another topic was a proposed deck addition on Howard Street. The applicant described plans for a 15 by 15-foot deck with a roof, sparking discussion about the dimensions and materials. Members emphasized the need for the deck to align with the existing structure. The commission also debated the design of the railing system, particularly focusing on historical accuracy and aesthetics. Ultimately, conceptual approval was recommended to address design refinements and ensure adherence to guidelines.

Additionally, the commission discussed the Burton project on Howard Street, which involved lifting the house and adding a story and a half. The project had received conceptual approval previously, and the commission expressed satisfaction with the modifications, leading to a unanimous vote for final approval. The project manager and owner were commended for their efforts to enhance the property while respecting its historical context.

01:07:14As the meeting progressed, members addressed procedural matters, such as recusals due to conflicts of interest in specific applications. This included a recusal related to the Sheffer application due to prior involvement with the architect. The commission also engaged in public comment, although only two members of the public were present. One attendee appreciated the commission’s projects but lamented the lack of investment in preservation guidebooks and standards in other municipalities.

The meeting also touched on logistical matters, such as the approval of a project with conditions requiring the submission of the south elevation. The commission planned for an upcoming special alignment workshop and discussed a press release about the June 9 meeting regarding the historic district map amendment. The public notice was slated for circulation by Wednesday to ensure adequate notice.

01:12:20In a lighter moment, the commission introduced a new initiative for official city polo shirts featuring the city seal and Historic Preservation Commission branding. Members discussed color and material options, with costs covered by the members themselves. The proposal had received approval from both the mayor and city manager.