Solicitor Chris Gillan Schwarz presented the proposed ordinance changes, which include a formal process for designating landmark trees based on various criteria, such as biological, cultural, and historical significance. This proposal intends to replace the existing specimen tree designation, allowing the commission to nominate and vote on trees for landmark status. Furthermore, the changes aim to streamline tree removal applications by introducing a clear review process and criteria, emphasizing that trees cannot be removed without a permit. Factors for consideration include the tree’s health, potential hazards, and cultural or ecological value. The commission will employ a balancing test to determine if the benefits of removal outweigh the detriments, with applicants bearing the burden of proof.

The meeting also explored tree replacement and mitigation strategies, with an emphasis on creative solutions to preserve trees whenever possible. The commission discussed root-friendly sidewalk repairs as an alternative to tree removal and proposed a mitigation fee in cases where physical replacement is not feasible. This fee would contribute to the newly proposed tree bank, facilitating preservation efforts within the community. The commission members generally agreed on the importance of having clear guidelines and suggested developing a summary handbook to make the ordinance more accessible to the public.

Discussions highlighted the challenges of tree management amid construction, with members acknowledging past failures in protecting trees during development projects. A notable case involved a large oak tree on Washington Street that was damaged during construction. The commission proposed creating a “watch list” for trees at risk of damage.

In addition to ordinance revisions, the meeting addressed several tree removal and trimming requests. The commission unanimously voted against the removal of a hollow sycamore on West Perry due to its viability after crown reduction. Similar decisions were made for other trees, emphasizing the commission’s preference for preservation when safety or health concerns are not present. The discussion also touched on the enforcement of tree care standards, noting the need for contractors to adhere to established pruning guidelines to prevent unnecessary damage.

One contentious topic involved the removal of invasive “tree of heaven” species, with the commission planning to use grant money for this purpose. The dialogue revealed complexities in removing trees that homeowners may wish to keep, particularly when classified as street trees. The commission underscored the importance of balancing public interest with individual preferences while exploring treatment methods that minimize pesticide use.

A homeowner’s request for the removal of a newly planted crimson maple on Virginia Avenue sparked debate about the potential precedent such actions could set. The commission ultimately decided against relocating the tree, citing concerns about potential neglect if the homeowner did not want it.

The meeting concluded with discussions on unauthorized tree removals, emphasizing the need for enforcement and accountability. A notable violation involved a homeowner cutting down a public tree on Windsor Avenue without permission, prompting the commission to consider legal action. This incident underscores the ongoing challenges the commission faces in safeguarding the community’s urban forest.