The meeting’s primary focus was the police station renovation project, which culminated in the approval of a $4,244,532 budget. This figure includes a 12% contingency to buffer potential cost overruns, bringing the total construction bid to $3,383,341, with additional alternate costs. Discussions highlighted the importance of clarity and transparency with the public and addressed public interest in the project. The board emphasized the distinction between a debt exclusion and a Proposition 2 ½ override.

The renovation committee’s decision to exclude certain alternates in the heating system from the project’s current scope was noteworthy. This exclusion stemmed from a strategic choice to consider these upgrades in the future. The board members engaged in a dialouge to clarify budget figures and the process. Public comments were solicited to ensure community voices were heard.

Another topic was the fire station renovation project. The board reviewed options presented by Tecton, the architectural firm, which included a range of costs from $10 million to $30 million, reflecting varying levels of renovation and expansion. A participant critiqued the current approach, arguing that the focus should shift to community needs before finalizing designs. The board acknowledged the necessity of forming a building committee to ensure comprehensive community engagement and project vetting.

The fire station discussions also touched on the possibility of transitioning from an on-call fire department to a full-time model, highlighting the need for a long-term vision that reflects the town’s evolving demographics and operational requirements. The board agreed that any design should not only address current needs but also anticipate future demands, particularly in light of gender diversity and firefighter safety. The importance of community input was reiterated, with plans to gather more feedback before the fall town meeting.

The meeting also addressed the MBTA community citizen petition. The petition called for the planning board to present more than one option for the MBTA plan. While some board members were hesitant to take an official position on the petition, they agreed on the importance of communicating feedback and direction to the planning board.

Further discussions included the accessory dwelling unit (ADU) bylaw, which proposed changes to the size and regulatory process of accessory apartments. The board unanimously supported the bylaw, which reduces the maximum size from 1,200 to 900 square feet and introduces a site plan approval process. This decision aimed to align local regulations with state mandates while retaining reasonable conditions for development.

They reviewed a budget proposal from the House Ways and Means Committee, which included a positive change in state aid, and discussed borrowing terms for a new fire truck. The board settled on a maximum useful life of 25 years for the fire engine, balancing the need for lower annual costs against ensuring the community does not pay for a vehicle no longer in service.