Chaska Planning Commission Reviews Cloud HQ’s 72-Foot Data Center Amid Height, Noise, and Landscaping Concerns.

The Chaska Planning Commission meeting on October 9, 2024, was dominated by discussions about Cloud HQ’s proposed data center, which faces challenges over its unprecedented 72-foot height, noise concerns, and significant landscaping requirements. The commission considered a zoning ordinance amendment to accommodate the height increase, adjustments to parking provisions, and an alternative landscaping plan due to site limitations. Neighborhood feedback raised apprehensions about the project’s impact on community aesthetics and noise levels, necessitating analysis and public engagement.

0:00The proposed data center project by Cloud HQ, located north of Angler Boulevard, is set to rise to 72.5 feet, doubling the current zoning limit of 36 feet. This proposed height increase is essential to meet the operational needs of the data center, as articulated by the developers, and requires a zoning ordinance amendment. The building’s substantial footprint of 1.4 million square feet includes a mix of architectural elements, such as precast concrete panels, aluminum accents, and vine walls, designed to mitigate the visual impact. However, the height of the structure and its proximity to residential areas have sparked concerns among commissioners and residents alike.

A significant portion of the meeting focused on the landscaping plan, which proposes a 30-foot berm to buffer the data center from adjacent residential areas. While the plan calls for the planting of over 1,500 overstory trees, 390 understory trees, and more than 2,300 shrubs, the current proposal falls short of these requirements, prompting discussions about an alternative landscaping strategy. The commission explored options such as planting additional trees on city-owned land or establishing a tree bank to enhance public spaces. The landscaping was not only intended for visual screening but also as a noise buffer, although the effectiveness of this approach was debated.

1:16:50Noise concerns were a recurring theme throughout the meeting. Residents expressed apprehension about the potential sound impact from the data center’s mechanical equipment, including rooftop chillers and generators. The developers assured the commission that advanced noise mitigation technologies would be employed, such as low-sound fans and hospital-grade silencers, which are expected to keep noise levels around 47 decibels—comparable to household sounds. Despite these assurances, skepticism remained about the accuracy of noise modeling and its real-world application, with some residents advocating for baseline noise measurements to establish a reference point before operations begin.

1:35:01The public hearing segment saw residents voicing their concerns about various aspects of the project, including the berm’s height, stormwater runoff management, and potential light pollution. A civil engineer clarified that the stormwater management plan includes significant swales and dual culverts to handle runoff effectively. However, some residents remained unconvinced, fearing that the berm might exacerbate drainage issues in their backyards.

59:59Concerns were raised about the potential encroachment into designated green belt areas, which some commissioners felt contradicted the city’s planning ethos. The commission emphasized the importance of maintaining neighborhood integrity and upholding commitments made during previous planning phases.

2:26:47Furthermore, the meeting included a discussion about a proposed amendment to allow a baseball and softball training facility on Chaska Creek Way. The amendment seeks to adapt zoning regulations to accommodate recreational uses within the Planned Multiuse District (PMD2). The facility aims to employ 20 to 25 individuals and serve a wide demographic, aligning with the comprehensive plan’s guidance for business parks. The commission debated noise implications and the facility’s compatibility with existing TIF district guidelines, ultimately recommending approval of the zoning ordinance amendment for city council review.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: