The board’s scrutiny of the proposed development’s crosswalk safety measures was particularly notable. Concerns were raised about ensuring pedestrian safety through appropriate signalization at a crosswalk near the project site. Members emphasized the need for features like red warning flashers, beyond just painted lines, to secure safe passage for pedestrians. This aspect of the project sparked a detailed debate, with some members urging for a more descriptive terminology to reflect the safety measures accurately. The inclusion of police department recommendations added another layer to the discussion, highlighting the critical nature of pedestrian safety in the overall project design.

Another focal point of the meeting was the project’s affordable housing component. The proposal includes 32 units designated for households earning 60% of the area median income (AMI) and remaining units at 110% of AMI. The board noted a contingency: if foreclosure occurs, affordable units could revert to only 25% being available for lower-income households. This stipulation, though rare in rental projects, was considered necessary due to the constraints of the subsidizing program. The board also delved into the complexities of local preference for affordable housing, acknowledging the challenges posed by fair housing laws. Penrose has volunteered to assist in the application process to secure local preference, though the board recognized this as a complicated endeavor.

Parking emerged as a contentious topic, with no final consensus on allocation. The board considered a proposal to allot one parking space per unit, with additional spaces distributed on a first-come, first-served basis. There was a suggestion to review parking efficiency six months post-occupancy, allowing adjustments if necessary.

The board’s deliberations also highlighted the need for a robust landscaping plan, including maintaining mature trees and potentially installing an irrigation system. The project’s design aims to comply with local architectural styles, incorporating board feedback to enhance visual appeal and functionality. Discussions around building materials revealed a shift from wood cedar shingles to a cementitious product, driven by economic considerations. This change prompted a detailed review of terminology.

Stormwater management and fire safety were critical aspects of the project’s approval process. The board emphasized compliance with state requirements. The fire chief’s input underscored the need for adequate emergency vehicle access and fire flow, with confirmation required from both the fire chief and the Department of Public Works.

Signage and lighting were scrutinized to ensure compliance with local regulations and aesthetic standards. A waiver was requested for a double-sided sign, sparking discussions about sizing and zoning implications. Lighting plans must adhere to dark sky regulations.

As the meeting drew to a close, discussions turned to legal and procedural aspects, with conditions outlined for the project’s progression. These included restrictions on the number of units, requirements for agency approval, and submission of final plans. The board also addressed enforcement capabilities.