One notable issue discussed was the variance hearing for the property on Taylor Pond Road, represented by David Clark of Clark Engineering. The project entails demolishing an existing dwelling and installing a new Title 5 septic system, replacing the outdated cesspools that have served the property for over half a century. The property, originally a six-bedroom house, will be rebuilt as a four-bedroom dwelling, aligning with the family’s decision to consolidate living arrangements by building an additional house on a nearby lot.

The board faced challenges in approving the variance due to the property’s proximity to a coastal bank, which technically required the septic system to be positioned at least 100 feet away. However, given the constraints of the lot and the man-made nature of the existing land forms, the proposed septic system could not meet this requirement. The board had to balance environmental compliance with practical considerations, ultimately agreeing to position the system in a corner of the property where it posed minimal intrusion.

There was an extended discussion on the policy of granting variances for redevelopment projects. Concerns were raised about whether existing property owners should be allowed to rebuild to the size of their current structures. The board’s informal policy has typically allowed for maintaining existing bedroom counts, assuming the new construction complies with Title 5’s flow limits. Staff member Judy clarified that the board permits retaining the existing number of bedrooms unless the construction exceeds the regulated flow.

The board also deliberated on the potential use of Innovative/Alternative (I/A) technology for the septic system. However, this option was not pursued, given the family’s plan to reduce the number of bedrooms. The board noted that while a six-bedroom setup on a small lot is uncommon, the reduction in bedroom count offered a trade-off to mitigate environmental impacts.

Ultimately, the board approved the variance with conditions, including limiting the property to four bedrooms, the submission of a detailed engineered as-built plan, and a requirement for further board review if the floor plan is altered.

The meeting also addressed waste management reforms, specifically the implementation of a new affidavit form for rubbish haulers. The form, set to be effective from January 1, requires haulers to attest that they will only dispose of Chatham-generated waste. This measure aims to ensure compliance with local environmental regulations.

Attention was given to the repairs needed for the waste building floor, which had received budget approval. Board members discussed strategies for conducting repairs without disrupting operations, considering temporary measures like off-site truck use. The building’s closure on Wednesdays may facilitate repair scheduling.

Additionally, the board highlighted an upcoming opioid settlement funds listening session designed to gather community input on utilizing funds from a federal settlement with pharmaceutical companies, including the Sackler family. The session’s objective is to solicit feedback on fund allocation towards harm reduction, education, and support services for those struggling with substance use disorders. The board has already channeled these funds into local health services and educational initiatives, with annual reports evaluating their impact.

The board also touched upon substance use issues within Chatham, noting a decline in opioid-related deaths but persisting concerns around alcohol and mental health. Efforts to keep the community informed include potential advertising strategies to raise awareness of available services.

Finally, the board discussed an unresolved compliance issue with a property previously fined, noting that communication efforts had been unsuccessful, leading to accumulated fines and potential legal actions.