Central to the discussions was the debate on the need to update the town’s historical survey forms, which have not been comprehensively revised since 1991. Commission members were divided on whether to prioritize the updating of old forms or to focus on the creation of new ones to encompass areas not previously documented. The estimated cost for these updates stands at $30,000 for new forms and $25,000 for updating the existing ones, with grant money being considered to fund these projects.

Members also considered the adoption of a form A, or an area form, specifically for assessing the historical significance of properties in the Riverbay area. This would facilitate the administrative review process for properties older than 75 years, allowing for a preliminary determination of historical significance before full Commission review. The idea of looking to Salem, Massachusetts’ ordinance for guidance on this process was suggested.

Another point of discussion was the review of the current bylaw’s 75-year threshold for historic acceptance. While comparing Chatham’s standards with those of other Massachusetts towns, it became evident that the majority also adhere to a 75-year threshold, with none below 100 years. There was no consensus reached on whether Chatham should adjust its threshold to exceed 75 years. Further guidance and information were deemed necessary before a decision could be made, particularly in areas such as River Bay and Harding Beach Shores.

The Commission also touched on the subject of the William and Anna Nickerson Homestead archaeological site, emphasizing its national register eligibility and the importance of protecting potential Native American burial grounds. Public concern was voiced by a citizen, Carolyn Whittle, over potential development adjacent to the Nickerson Family Cemetery.

Moreover, the Commission discussed the US Coast Guard boat houses and their historical significance, with a select board meeting scheduled for August 6 to further address the matter. The importance of documentation, evaluation, and protection of such historical resources was underscored during a presentation by preservation consultant Eric Dre, despite technical difficulties initially connecting him to the meeting.

The possibility of implementing a proactive role in providing formal documentation and information about historical significance to town boards was debated. This initiative aims to increase public awareness and ensure that Chatham’s historical assets are adequately considered in development decisions.

The Commission also deliberated over the Certified Local Government program, which could provide grants to aid in the preservation plan, with a focus on planning and funding grant applications. Additionally, the Commission expressed hope to work with new planner Christina Grady on administrative amendments to the demolition delay bylaw.

The discussions revealed an underlying concern about the broader criteria for defining historical buildings and the need for a review of thresholds for exceptions to historical designation. The potential eligibility of historical sites for grants and the implications for land use and national register considerations were also examined in connection with the Nickerson family.