Chatham Commission Votes on Historic Property Changes

In a recent meeting, the Chatham Historical Commission deliberated on several noteworthy applications and topics related to the town’s historical properties. Among the issues discussed were proposed alterations to properties on Freem Hill Lane and Old Harbor Road, the historical significance of structures, and the potential impact of changes to the criteria for determining historical significance.

A significant portion of the meeting focused on the application concerning a property on Old Harbor Road. Commission members debated the historical significance of the house and its proposed alterations, eventually determining that the house met the criteria for historic significance and that the proposed work would not detract from its historic value. Despite some reservations about the architectural integrity of an addition to the house, the commission elected to impose a three-month demolition delay to provide the applicant with additional design guidance.

The commission also reviewed an application from an architect for a property on Freem Hill Lane. The proposal included the construction of an addition comprising a stair, office space, and a bathroom while maintaining the building’s original state. Commission members discussed the importance of preserving the historic charm of the Old Village area and the constraints of modifying a small property. The application was noted for its effort to preserve the historic cottage and incorporate elements such as solar panels while considering the preservation of pear trees and the design of new windows.

Additionally, the commission acknowledged the historical significance of the building on Mill Hill Lane, confirming it as a contributing structure in the National Historic Register District and concluding that the proposed alterations did not warrant a referral to the Cape Cod Commission.

The debate over historical significance extended beyond individual properties. Commission members considered whether to update the 75-year rule that determines historical significance. Discussions included the possibility of changing the rule to either 100 years or 25 years.

The meeting also addressed the topic of demolition by neglect, with the commission awaiting the hiring of a planner to assist with this issue. Furthermore, the potential expansion of the administrative review process was debated, which would allow for minor changes to properties without full commission approval.

The commission received comments and recommendations from Eric Dre on updating Form B’s—documentation assessing historical significance—completed between 1978 and 1991. Dre suggested prioritizing the updates and re-evaluating some of the Form B’s within the national register district. The need for professional preservation consultants in this process was emphasized, underlining the importance of maintaining accurate and up-to-date historical records.

The addition of the Nickerson family dig to the National Register as a historical site and the return of the Coast Guard boat house were also topics of discussion.

The meeting opened with a moment of remembrance for Don Aman, a senior commission member who had served for 25 years.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: