09:41A point of discussion involved a field change request for property on Scattery Road. The property owner proposed the removal of three trees—a cherry tree and two English oaks—to enhance a view corridor. In exchange for the removals, seven cedar trees were to be planted. Matt Lonberger from Wilkinson Ecological explained the rationale behind the request, emphasizing the cherry tree’s obstruction of the view and the two oaks’ future potential to block views. However, the proposal met with skepticism from commission members, who questioned the necessity of removing the younger oaks. One member argued for maintaining a narrower view corridor that would preserve the trees while still affording a decent view. Janet Williams pointed out that typically such requests occur post-construction. She referenced the property’s history of unpermitted tree removals, which had already resulted in a restoration area providing a significant view corridor. The commission deliberated whether to revise the plan to focus solely on the cherry tree’s removal, leaving the younger oaks intact, but ultimately decided to continue the discussion on April 23, 2025.

43:01Another agenda item was the proposal for a swimming pool at a property on Strong Island Road, located within a floodplain. The discussion revolved around the potential impact of the pool on local floodwater dynamics. Members expressed concern about how the pool might interact with floodwaters, given the property’s bowl-like topography, which could lead to water accumulation. The project’s engineer explained that the pool would be situated at an elevation of approximately 11.5 feet, with drainage solutions initially proposed but later revised. Members debated whether additional drainage structures were needed to ensure effective floodwater management. The conversation also touched on the pool’s design concerning the surrounding patio and the potential need for off-site water transportation in case of storms. Despite assurances that the pool would not displace floodwater, the commission remained divided over the suitability of its location, especially given historical flooding events.

41:43The meeting also addressed a project on Independence Lane, focusing on mitigation plans for a driveway and landscaping adjustments within a wetland buffer zone. The revised site plan incorporated feedback from previous hearings, with modifications aimed at enhancing mitigation efforts closer to the wetland. The commission considered the appropriateness of the design and its potential environmental impact, ultimately deciding to continue the discussion to ensure thorough evaluation.

30:43In addition to these projects, the commission reviewed a request for an amendment of conditions on Capri Lane, where the Andre family sought to modify their garage addition to accommodate an elevator for accessibility. The commission approved the first phase, acknowledging the necessity of the changes for improved accessibility.

01:21:51The meeting concluded with a request for a certificate of compliance for a property on Bark Cliff Avenue. The commission noted the property’s long compliance history but raised concerns about discrepancies in maintenance and unauthorized structures. After discussions, the commission approved the certificate, contingent on addressing the noted issues.