A prominent topic was the debated request for determining the applicability of a proposed fencing project on Captain’s Cove Lane. The project aims to replace an existing fence with a new one that encompasses the backyard, intending to contain active dogs. Commissioners raised serious environmental concerns due to the property’s proximity to a salt marsh and a critical wildlife habitat. The planned four-foot chain link fence, with gaps every eight to ten feet for wildlife passage, was scrutinized for potentially obstructing wildlife movement. One commissioner pointed out that the proposed wildlife gaps were insufficient, arguing for more frequent passageways to facilitate natural habitat preservation. Others suggested alternatives, such as a smaller pen for the dogs, or even invisible fencing, although this was dismissed due to the skittish nature of one of the dogs.

The commission also tackled redevelopment plans for a property on Foxhill Road, focusing on stormwater management and tree preservation. The representative for the property introduced revisions to mitigate concerns over impervious surfaces, including converting an existing driveway to permeable pavement. Tree preservation was a focal point, with an initial proposal to remove a pine tree being reconsidered after further evaluation deemed it necessary to remain. The discourse highlighted a collaborative effort to balance homeowner interests with environmental preservation, leading to significant plan adjustments.

In a related matter, the commission assessed a comprehensive management plan affecting two properties, focusing on invasive species control and native plant restoration. The plan proposed the removal of 51 invasive white poplar trees, alongside managing a total of 34,000 square feet of invasive plant cover, including bittersweet vine and common reed. This initiative was coupled with restoring a substantial area with native grasses and wildflowers. Despite the ecological benefits, concerns were raised about the feasibility of meeting current tree mitigation requirements.

Additionally, the commission reviewed a Notice of Intent for properties at lots 28 and 28A, Stson Cove Road, involving the demolition and construction of residences within a coastal bank buffer zone. The project, which includes a new house, swimming pool, and patio, faced scrutiny due to its location within a no disturb zone. The commission emphasized the need for a site visit, acknowledging the project’s unique nature and its potential impact on coastal resources. The commission expressed a preference for visual assessment before proceeding, highlighting the significance of thorough site evaluations in decision-making processes.

Discussions extended to the management of invasive phragmites, focusing on innovative removal strategies involving cutting and bundling. The labor-intensive process, planned over several years, aims to maintain the ecological integrity of affected areas, including a healthy salt marsh. The potential success of this method was compared to ongoing efforts against Japanese knotweed.

The commission also addressed compliance issues, reviewing applications for Certificates of Compliance across several properties. A partial certificate request for properties at Sears Point Road prompted legal considerations to clarify encumbrances on property deeds. Meanwhile, landscaping compliance on Lady Slipper Lane was approved despite some plant replacements pending installation. In another case, ongoing conditions for a nourishment plan on Old Harbor Road required amendments to ensure consultation with the conservation agent before future work commenced.