0:00The demolition application for the cottage on Pine Null Avenue was a significant topic of discussion. The cottage had just crossed the 75-year threshold, a key criterion for historical consideration. However, members of the commission agreed that the structure lacked architectural and historical significance. Jamie Norcross, representing the owners, argued that the cottage did not hold historical relevance. The commission’s consensus was that the cottage did not meet the criteria for historical significance. This decision allowed the demolition to proceed without delay, acknowledging the owners’ plans to build a larger retirement home on the property. The discussion also touched on the charm of Cape Cod cottages and the practical challenges of modernizing older structures within the zoning constraints of the area.

38:51Attention then shifted to the Pemrose property, where the commission was tasked with advising the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) on the historical significance of its buildings. Although consensus was reached that the buildings themselves were not historically significant, members expressed reservations about the proposed development’s design and density. The commission’s role was advisory, focusing on historical aspects, yet members were keen to voice their opinions. Concerns were raised that the proposed design appeared too institutional, detracting from the area’s historic character. A member cited public comments highlighting the need for a design that resonates more with the local aesthetic. The proposed development includes 48 units with 63 parking spaces, which some members felt might be insufficient, exacerbating the density issue. The commission planned to draft a letter to the ZBA outlining these concerns, emphasizing the importance of considering the development’s impact on the neighborhood’s character.

24:33In addition to these primary discussions, the commission reviewed administrative processes and ongoing projects. The removal of a deteriorating chimney on Adams Lane was acknowledged, and the commission reaffirmed its decision on the property’s status. There were calls to revisit the administrative review process to streamline operations and clarify procedures for new members.

Updates on ongoing projects were also provided. The commission discussed the surveys and Form Bs, noting that funding had been secured, and a draft statement of work was in development. Coordination with the principal planner was emphasized to ensure the commission’s recommendations were integrated. The eligibility of the William Anan Nixon archaeological homestead for the National Register was under review, pending input from the conservation foundation regarding its connection to Indigenous peoples.

The chairman’s report offered updates on properties under demolition delays, notably 322 Bridge Street, where negotiations were ongoing. The commission also discussed the Pemrose presentation’s implications, reiterating their role as stakeholders in projects utilizing state or federal funds in historic districts. The need for careful consideration of these projects was emphasized to maintain Chatham’s historical integrity.

38:51Public participation added another dimension to the meeting. Robert Wilson expressed interest in preserving older buildings, while Robert Stevens raised concerns about the sustainable housing project’s lot sizes and density. Stevens provided metrics indicating that the proposed development might not offer adequate parking or space for future families. Although the commission’s focus is on historical preservation, members acknowledged the importance of these concerns and encouraged written submissions to the select board and zoning board to ensure these perspectives are considered.