05:55The meeting, held on May 6, 2025, saw a detailed examination of the property on Crows Pond Road. The current owner, through representative William F. Riley, sought to demolish the 1910 structure to make way for new construction. Riley argued that the house lacked historical significance, noting its absence from the National Register of Historic Places and highlighting its architectural modifications over the years. However, several commission members disagreed, emphasizing the house’s representation of the Greek revival style typical of Chatham in the early 20th century.

16:25The commission’s discussion revealed a broader concern about the loss of historical homes in Chatham. One member pointed out that even though the property had undergone changes, it still played a part in the town’s architectural narrative. The idea of a demolition delay was proposed as a means to engage further with the owner about potential preservation strategies, with members suggesting options like moving or expanding the house while maintaining its historical integrity.

25:10The debate culminated in a motion to officially recognize the building’s historical significance, which received unanimous support. Following this, a motion was passed to impose a 365-day demolition delay, giving the property owner time to explore preservation alternatives. The cost and logistics of relocating the house were also discussed, with estimates suggesting a move could cost around $100,000.

47:53Shifting focus, the commission also reviewed a proposal from Kate Shell concerning a cottage on Gillis Road, described as a Sears and Roebuck catalog home built between 1924 and 1926. Shell, the daughter of Tom Gillis, proposed moving the cottage to allow for new construction while preserving its integrity. The commission expressed strong support for the plan, recognizing the cottage’s historical significance and the owners’ commitment to maintaining its original character. A motion to deem the cottage historically significant was unanimously approved, with members praising the project for aligning with the town’s preservation goals.

48:42During the meeting, the commission also addressed the West Chatham housing development at 1563-1533 Main Street, a project by Penrose Development. While the Massachusetts Historical Commission found no significant impact on the historic district, the Chatham commission voiced concerns about the project’s design. Members criticized the uniformity of the proposed buildings, which they felt did not reflect Chatham’s architectural character. The commission also questioned the necessity of a proposed community center.

Concerns were raised about the project’s adherence to local building codes, such as the 30-foot height limit, with members questioning the implications of potential variances on emergency services. Parking arrangements were another point of contention, with the commission pointing out the insufficiency of available spaces for the projected number of residents. Despite these issues, there was an acknowledgment of the need for affordable housing and a general willingness to find solutions that would suit both the development’s goals and the town’s historical context.

01:07:59The commission concluded by planning to draft a formal response to the Zoning Board of Appeals, outlining their concerns and suggestions. This response will aim to ensure that any new developments in Chatham respect the town’s historical fabric while meeting modern needs.