Catalyst Architects presented a detailed proposal for the CAL, utilizing 3D software to aid visualizations of potential renovations aimed at addressing deficiencies and enhancing the center’s functionality and aesthetics. The proposal detailed structural upgrades, including the removal of existing columns in the basement, HVAC improvements, accessibility modifications, and a potential new wing for a senior day program. The architects’ presentation prompted a thorough discussion among board members about the building’s footprint, the necessity of renovations, and the prioritization of seniors’ needs within the community.

The budget for renovations was reviewed, with costs color-coded by priority. Blue included the green items but added a new entry vestibolt and accessible entrance, and yellow contemplated an addition for a senior day program. Discussions about the feasibility of a dormer to reduce the conference room size and enlarge the function room on the second floor were also brought to light.

The board expressed a range of perspectives on the proposed renovations. While some members were in favor of the “blue option,” which included a new senior day program wing, others were skeptical of the estimated costs and the functionality of the proposed multi-purpose room. Concerns were raised about the larger multi-purpose room’s ability to accommodate events and whether the cost might exceed estimates. The square footage of the existing and proposed rooms was scrutinized, revealing differing opinions on the best course of action.

Further discussion ensued about the need for a more detailed breakdown of renovation options to make informed decisions. The board debated the potential for cost increases if changes or additions were made to the plans. There was also a sense of urgency to move the project forward, with some members expressing frustration over the prolonged decision-making process and emphasizing the need to prioritize the seniors’ needs.

The meeting also covered the necessity for further direction to staff regarding the retention of work for renovation of the lower level of the building. Options presented included creating a new entrance from the lower parking lot, renovating existing spaces, and adding accessible restrooms and a small kitchenette. Public comments requested clarification on the funding and voting process for the renovation, with some speakers expressing support for the “blue option” as a practical and feasible solution.

In response to the complexities of the CAL renovation project, a proposal was put forth to seek more detailed cost estimates, with a decision to move forward with the “blue option” contingent on funding availability and further reports from consultants. The board conveyed overall support for this proposal, pending additional information on funding and feasibility.

Aside from the focal topic of the CAL renovations, the board engaged in a public hearing regarding the parking prohibition on C View Street. A notice was read by a select board member, and the Chatham Police liaison to the Traffic Safety Committee presented the case for the prohibition. Safety concerns due to the narrowness of the street and increased difficulties during busy times were cited as primary reasons for the proposed ban. Public input included both disagreement with and support for the prohibition, with one member of the public highlighting the safety hazards currently present. The motion to prohibit parking, with an amendment to request painting of the crosswalk by the Department of Public Works, was passed with one dissenting vote.

The meeting further delved into the funding and appropriation for various town maintenance and improvement projects. The Town Manager discussed leveraging grant funding for projects such as HVAC work, elevator modernization, and foundation repairs. The board considered the need for town meeting approval for such maintenance activities and explored potential offsets and grants to mitigate costs.

Additionally, a petitioned protective zoning bylaw amendment was addressed. The board referred the proposed amendment to the planning board for a public hearing, as required by law.

Committee appointments were another significant part of the meeting, with the board voting on reappointments to several commissions and committees. The announcement of a new Town Counsel was made, and the Town Manager was tasked with subsequent arrangements.