The meeting’s most issue was the proposal for a Request for Proposals (RFP) related to affordable housing on Stepping Stones Road. The board was divided on the appropriate density for the development, with suggestions ranging from 8 to 20 units. Concerns were raised about whether the land could accommodate the higher end of that range without compromising the neighborhood’s character. One member emphasized the need for a minimum of 12 units while allowing flexibility for developers to propose viable options. They highlighted the importance of considering the physical limitations of the site, including topography and existing infrastructure challenges, such as sewer connections, which could impact design and costs.

The RFP discussion included considerations of building design and the desire to maintain the “Chatham character” within the development. The board debated the necessity of a workshop to review the RFP in detail, ultimately deciding that members should examine the document independently to avoid further delays. A motion to approve the RFP with suggested revisions was passed with a vote of four in favor and one against.

Simultaneously, the board addressed the residential tax exemption, a topic that has sparked considerable debate among members and residents alike. The exemption aims to shift the tax burden within the residential class, potentially benefiting year-round residents. However, concerns were raised about the administrative burden of implementing the exemption, with estimates suggesting over 3,300 properties could be involved. One board member cited the example of Wellfleet and Nantucket, discussing the potential benefits for local homeowners while acknowledging the need for careful analysis to avoid unintended consequences.

The board also considered a motion to extend the town council’s contract, which had expired in May. While there was consensus on the effectiveness of the current legal representation, some members expressed a desire to solicit new applicants. Ultimately, a motion to maintain the existing contract was passed with a vote of four in favor and one against, allowing the board to continue utilizing the current legal services while leaving room for future evaluations.

Public engagement policies were another focal point of the meeting, with discussions on how to manage public comments more efficiently. The board approved a proposal to reduce speaking time for public comments from five minutes to three minutes. They also emphasized the importance of public participation, affirming that comments would be permitted at the chair’s discretion, with exceptions for specific agenda items.

Additionally, the board made several committee appointments, including the taxation aid committee and the cultural council. These appointments were confirmed through roll call votes, with terms extending to 2028 for most positions. The meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn.