The primary focus was on potential zoning bylaw amendments related to housing density. The board debated a proposal allowing for a density of 12 units per acre, deemed necessary to incentivize developers to construct both market-based and affordable housing units. Concerns emerged that reducing this density to five or ten units might not adequately motivate developers, possibly hindering the availability of affordable housing. One participant argued that maintaining a higher density could maximize affordable housing, while others supported a proposal to allow five units by right and up to ten units by special permit. This proposal included stipulations that the fifth and tenth units must be affordable and attainable, with no payment in lieu options.

Additionally, the board revisited the definition and regulation of short-term rentals. Members discussed a proposal requiring property owners to reside in their units for at least ten months of the year, allowing rentals for up to two months. However, enforceability concerns were raised, highlighting potential challenges in implementing such a requirement.

Further discussions involved the intricacies of density bonuses and affordable housing obligations. The board considered a requirement for new or rehabilitated developments with two or more dwelling units to allocate 20% as deed-restricted affordable housing. A contentious clause allowed developers to fulfill these obligations through financial contributions instead of construction, which some members felt undermined the bylaw’s intent. Clarifying and aligning these requirements with the board’s intentions was deemed essential.

The board also explored the impact of zoning changes on the West Chatham Neighborhood Center. A proposal to allow up to eight units per 40,000 square feet, with specific affordable housing stipulations, was debated. Concerns were raised that incentivizing developers to pursue Chapter 40B development could bypass local zoning controls, leading to less desirable outcomes. The board sought to maintain a balance between promoting affordable housing and safeguarding local zoning integrity.

In addressing the broader implications of zoning changes, the board discussed residential parking requirements, advocating for flexibility in site plan reviews to accommodate both residents and visitors. Suggestions included setting a minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit to ensure adequate provisions for anticipated residential growth.

The meeting also covered the need for clarity in the definitions of “affordable” and “attainable” housing. The integration of cottage court zoning into the neighborhood center zoning proposal was considered crucial for accommodating working families.