Chatham Select Board Reviews Budget and Zoning Amid Development Debates

During the Chatham Select Board meeting on February 25, 2025, the board tackled a variety of issues, with the Fiscal Year 2026 budget and zoning bylaw amendments taking center stage. The meeting, which was held both in person and remotely, included discussions about budget increases, the implications of zoning regulations, and the complexities of proposed property developments.

0:28The most pressing topic was the review of the Fiscal Year 2026 budget. Finance Director Carrie Masel presented a revised operating budget of $44,154,028. This increase was largely attributed to a finalized retirement assessment and adjustments in capital expenditures, including a $220,000 allocation for replacing a 2005 dump truck. The capital budget totaled $3,162,650, with funding sources detailed as relying on free cash and specific funds such as the Waterway Improvement and cemetery lot sales.

Board members engaged in discussions about the budget’s impact, particularly focusing on a new contract for sludge removal at the Wastewater Pollution Control facility. This contract obviates the need for the facility to maintain its own rolloff truck, resulting in potential savings and increased efficiency. Following deliberations, the board moved to transmit the proposed budgets to the Finance Committee and to place them on the annual town meeting warrant.

27:52Parallel to budget deliberations, the board addressed a petition to amend the zoning bylaw concerning the installation of exterior mechanical appliances like HVAC systems and generators. The current regulation requires a 15-foot setback, which has posed challenges for properties lacking sufficient space, often necessitating variances. The amendment proposes a special permit process, including neighbor notifications and public comments, aimed at easing these restrictions while maintaining community harmony.

1:04:45In addition to zoning amendments, the meeting delved into the ramifications of potential property developments under the 40B comprehensive permit provision. This legislation would allow for higher density developments than typically permitted. Several scenarios were discussed, including options for both maintaining existing structures and introducing new housing units. The balance between maximizing housing opportunities and preserving neighborhood character was a recurring theme, reflecting community concerns over development impacts.

27:52The Community Preservation Act (CPA) recommendations presented by Gary Tennyson, chair of the Chatham Community Preservation Committee, also played a role in the meeting. Nine warrant articles were introduced for the forthcoming town meeting, totaling approximately $2.35 million. The articles included requests for funding various projects, such as $500,000 to support the affordable housing trust fund and $275,000 for the reconstruction of a historic barn associated with the Nickerson Family Association.

The CPA recommendations also emphasized the importance of preserving historical sites and supporting community projects. Requests included $50,035 for the restoration of 127 historic headstones at Union Cemetery and $140,000 for phase two of field studies on Chatham’s salt marsh ecosystems.

1:04:45Another focus was the development of a specific site, with discussions revolving around the design and density of potential housing units. The board considered multiple configurations, including single-family homes and duplexes, balancing economic feasibility with community values. Concerns about preserving existing structures, like a historical house and barn on the property, were weighed against the potential for new development.

1:57:01The meeting concluded with updates from the town manager’s report, covering topics such as budget reviews, capital project approvals, and upcoming elections. New hires in key town departments were announced, reflecting ongoing efforts to strengthen local governance and community services.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: