Chatham Select Board Reviews FY 2026 Budget Amid Concerns Over Sewer Expansion and School Funding

The Chatham Select Board meeting on January 21, 2025, centered on the proposed fiscal year 2026 budget, with discussions on capital improvement projects, specifically the $32 million sewer expansion and increased school assessments. The town’s financial outlook, including a substantial free cash balance, also featured prominently in the conversation, alongside strategies for managing upcoming financial commitments.

19:48The meeting’s most substantial discussion revolved around the fiscal year 2026 budget, proposed at approximately $43.9 million. One focus was the $32 million earmarked for a major sewer expansion, which led to a proposed debt exclusion ballot question. Board members debated whether the proposal would necessitate any borrowing beyond this amount, with clarifications provided that no additional borrowing would be anticipated for this project.

0:17The town’s financial health was highlighted by a 6.29% increase in valuation to approximately $12.34 billion and a reaffirmed AAA bond rating. However, the budget’s proposed 7.62% increase raised questions about sustainable funding sources. The finance director detailed the budget’s composition, with property taxes accounting for 66% of revenue, supplemented by local receipts and other funds. The budget also included a significant 15.42% increase for the water department, attributed to rising maintenance and labor costs.

19:48School funding emerged as another issue, with the Monomoy Regional School budget set at $49.6 million, resulting in a statutory assessment for Chatham of approximately $11.1 million—a 7.97% increase. This prompted inquiries about the rising school assessments and their impact on the town’s financial planning. Concerns were expressed about prioritizing school funding, especially in light of potential future needs, such as a significant middle school funding request anticipated in the coming years.

54:31The board addressed the town’s free cash balance, certified at $11.1 million. This figure, notably higher than in previous years, sparked discussions about effective communication of its origins and the importance of maintaining a reserve for unexpected financial needs. It was emphasized that the free cash was not new money but rather funds that had been reallocated or closed out by the fiscal year’s end. Concerns were raised about potential over-reliance on free cash for various projects, with suggestions to ensure transparency and fiscal management moving forward.

19:48A noteworthy element was the proposed staffing plan, which included five new full-time positions to address workload and service capacity, impacting the operating budget by $258,000, with total costs, including benefits, reaching approximately $412,000.

The capital planning process revealed $46 million in requests, with $2.9 million recommended for funding through free cash. The board scrutinized these requests, particularly the $32 million for public works sewer expansion, seeking clarification on specific projects and their feasibility. The conversation also touched on community preservation projects, with $2.35 million allocated for various initiatives, funded through specific funds rather than the tax levy.

1:09:11Infrastructure concerns included water and sewer systems, with discussions on increasing storage capacity and addressing existing well repairs. The board was urged to prioritize a clear plan for achieving sewer connection goals by 2030, with only about 900 of the projected 5,000 properties currently connected.

Finally, the potential impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on local funding was raised, particularly regarding federal support for climate initiatives. Uncertainty about these funds prompted questions about how the town would adjust its financial strategies, especially for projects dependent on anticipated grants.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: