The meeting began with a discussion on the need to approve the purchase of new DPW trucks. The contract pricing for these trucks was set to expire on September 12, making it essential for the council to act swiftly. The DPW director emphasized the importance of this purchase, noting that delays could affect the availability of the 2025 inventory and potentially disrupt municipal services. Budget implications were considered, with the funding for the trucks coming from the capital budget adopted a few months prior. The DPW director was commended for his prudent management of resources and the care taken in maintaining current equipment. After a thorough discussion, the council unanimously approved the motion to proceed with the purchase.

In another significant matter, the council addressed a proposed ordinance for a Farm Overlay Zone. This ordinance was prompted by the acquisition of property by PSEG for a laydown construction project that was never utilized as intended. The property was to be conveyed to the Great Swamp Watershed Association for their headquarters, which required a zoning change as the intended use was not permitted in the R1 Zone. The planning board and township attorney collaborated on drafting the ordinance, adding minor tweaks for clarity. The council acknowledged the interdepartmental cooperation that facilitated this process, recognizing the proactive efforts of the planning board in addressing potential zoning complications.

Questions arose about the broader implications of the overlay for future properties. It was clarified that the overlay applied only to designated properties and would not impact other R1 properties unless designated in the future. The overlay provides flexibility for developers to choose between adhering to the overlay or existing R1 zoning regulations. The council agreed to move forward with the ordinance for introduction at the next meeting, pending a review of minor adjustments suggested by the planning board planner.

Outdoor storage regulations were another topic of debate. Clarifications were made regarding whether the storage area referred to indoor or outdoor storage, particularly in relation to a barn at Feror Farm. The distinction was made clear, with the barn intended for indoor storage. The council discussed the need for precise definitions for new uses, such as a water quality laboratory, to avoid misunderstandings.

The Public Safety Committee reviewed a contract for the purchase of fire apparatus. Council members, including one identified as Roland, expressed support for moving forward with the contract after reviewing the financials and design schematics. The council appeared ready to authorize the contract in the upcoming meeting, pending any objections or further clarifications.

The Senior Center lighting project was briefly discussed, with bids expected by the 19th. Affordable housing public transportation services were also addressed, noting that only one bid had been received. The attorney’s review of the bid would dictate the next steps, which could include awarding the contract, rejecting it, or reissuing the bid.

Municipal Services agreements were another item on the agenda. These agreements pertain to reimbursements for services provided to condos and apartment buildings, such as snow plowing and street lighting. Three properties—Melrose, Enclave, and Cornerstone—were mentioned as the focus of these agreements. The reimbursement rates would be based on the township’s actual costs.

A proposal for a veteran suicide awareness event was brought to the council’s attention. The community group requested the use of Green Village Loop Park for an obstacle race, clarifying that it would be a hike or run with no physical obstacles set up in the park. The group assured the council of providing necessary insurance and signing an indemnity agreement. The police had already given their advisement on the event, and the date was expected to be adjusted slightly. The council appeared to support this initiative, with no objections raised during the discussions.

The council also discussed the planning of a charity 5K run/walk sponsored by the Chad Club and Team Car Wash. The police chief had met with the organizers to discuss safety measures, emphasizing safe crossings for participants. It was confirmed that the township would not incur any costs aside from the use of park space. The event would be organized by members of the Chad Club, including someone named Frank, who has experience with races and athletic events. While some skepticism about the organizers’ experience was expressed, the council acknowledged that similar charity events had been conducted in the past.

Additionally, the council approved an indemnity agreement with the Chatham Township Fire Department for their annual event, which includes the sale of alcohol on municipal property. This arrangement was supported by the council, aligning with previous practices.

During the administration portion, the issue of the barricade at the EST park was revisited. A council member expressed frustration over the continued locking of the gate during daylight hours, limiting public access. The council discussed potential solutions to make the park more accessible while maintaining safety, agreeing that further research and dialogue were needed.