57:05The proposed structure on Thelma Drive was designed to be larger than existing homes in the neighborhood, which sparked concern among residents about its potential impact on the visual landscape. The representative for the project argued that the lot’s larger size, due to its location adjacent to a pond, justified the home’s dimensions without detracting from the neighborhood’s character. Despite these assertions, several letters of opposition were read during the meeting. Neighbors, including Kathy and Michael Fredo, expressed dissatisfaction with the modifications made to the proposal, arguing that the changes did not sufficiently address concerns about the house’s size and visual impact. They highlighted minimal adjustments in roof pitch and general dimensions, which they felt were inadequate.

Michael Paige and other residents echoed these sentiments, pointing out that the reduction in square footage did little to alleviate concerns about the house’s mass and dominance in the neighborhood. The discussion also touched upon the removal of a planned fifth bedroom, which was cited as a substantial modification impacting the structure’s massing. However, residents like Susan Clifford criticized the lack of communication from the applicants following prior meetings and agreements.

In defense, the project representative emphasized that the alterations, including the removal of a room over the garage, reduced the external mass of the structure. They maintained that the building’s height and proximity to the street would not present issues concerning neighborhood visual character.

46:14The board was ultimately persuaded by the project’s compliance with zoning bylaws, aside from a minor frontage deficit. Members noted that the design included adequate setbacks and height restrictions and that the house’s underground portion would mitigate its visible size. The board also considered the potential for additional vegetation to further obscure the view from the street.

16:20As the meeting progressed, the board reviewed application number 25-5 for a property on Round Cove Road, where owners sought to add a 13-by-17-foot extension to their home. This application received unanimous approval due to its modest nature and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. Neighbors expressed support, and the board imposed conditions to ensure all construction activities remained on-site.

27:39The board also approved a proposal on Windmill Lane to elevate an existing dwelling out of the floodplain and construct an addition. This application was supported after deliberations confirmed compliance with FEMA regulations and acknowledgments from the Historic Commission that the changes did not diminish the building’s historical significance.

Another topic was the windmill structure project, which involved clarification on architectural changes suggested by the historical commission. The board confirmed satisfaction with the proposed changes, including a design adjustment from shingles to vertical siding to maintain historical integrity. The application was approved, contingent upon construction time restrictions and vehicle containment requirements.