01:41:32The application from Eastwood MBT LLC to demolish the existing dwelling on Main Street and construct a new one on a non-conforming lot was at the heart of the meeting. The proposed structure, designed by architect Karen Kemp, will increase the building coverage from 2,297 square feet to 2,844 square feet, staying within the allowable maximum of 2,900 square feet. The lot is non-conforming, as it measures 27,000 square feet, below the required 60,000 square feet in the R20 zoning district, necessitating a special permit.

Board discussions centered around the compatibility of the proposed design with the neighborhood’s character. Kemp described plans to position the new house 100 feet further back from the road than the current structure, which would enhance privacy and aesthetics through extensive landscaping. The new design aims to maintain a traditional Cape Cod style, featuring a full cape design with a centered chimney and a hidden garage, contrasting with the existing contemporary structure.

01:58:25Public opinion was divided. Barry Rearel, an adjacent property owner, expressed neutrality, acknowledging benefits from the landscaping but suggesting the house could be positioned closer to the road. In contrast, Robin Greb, an abutter, opposed the project, arguing that replacing a non-conforming building with a larger one could set a precedent for further non-compliance and increased density, potentially altering the neighborhood’s character.

The meeting also highlighted concerns over the perceived wastefulness of demolishing a house that appeared to be in decent condition. One participant criticized the demolition as unnecessary development, while a representative countered that the property had been on the market for a prolonged period without attracting buyers.

02:01:38Further deliberations touched on the design’s specifics, including the inclusion of awning windows in the basement not meeting egress requirements and the design’s dining areas, which were defended as functional for both daily use and special occasions. The landscape architect’s proposal was well-received, with a circular driveway design introduced to facilitate vehicle movement and avoid backing onto the main road.

01:40:11The board’s deliberations concluded with a unanimous decision to approve the application, subject to conditions regarding construction hours, particularly during the summer months, to limit disturbances in the neighborhood. The conditions included prohibiting exterior work on weekends and restricting construction to between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. during the summer.

08:18The meeting also addressed other noteworthy applications, such as the request from William F. Riley for a variance on Fox Hill Road. The property owner sought relief from the 30-foot building height restriction due to floodplain complications. The board considered environmental and economic factors, debating the impact on the property’s value and neighborhood consistency. Despite the challenges, the application was ultimately withdrawn without prejudice.

25:55Another proposal involved the renovation of a property formerly known as Camp Avalon. Kristen Rogman, a resident of Eastwood Road, opposed the application, citing potential ecological disruptions to local wildlife and the alteration of the neighborhood’s character. The board engaged in discussions about the environmental implications and the project’s compliance with flood zone regulations, ultimately highlighting the complexities of balancing development with environmental stewardship.

01:09:15Additionally, Jim and Lin Lin Lavell’s application for a special permit to expand their residence on a corner lot received unanimous approval. The board considered the modesty of the proposed changes, which aim to facilitate the Lavells’ eventual retirement without violating zoning bylaws. The project includes reorienting the house towards Malibar Road and adding living space while maintaining compatibility with the neighborhood’s character.