The most notable development was the board’s unanimous approval of application number 25-076, which sought to reconstruct a dilapidated private residential pier on Orleans Road. Steven Goldstein, representing the LLC, proposed a reconstruction that would maintain the existing footprint of the non-conforming pier while improving its structural integrity. The proposal raised questions about public safety and environmental impacts, particularly concerning shellfish habitats. Despite these concerns, the board supported the application, recognizing the need to address the pier’s disrepair.

Another topic of discussion involved the relocation of a historic cottage and the construction of a new dwelling on a non-conforming lot. The applicant proposed relocating the existing cottage across the street and constructing a new three-bedroom house with an innovative nitrogen reduction septic system. The board recognized the project’s effort to enhance environmental protection and preserve the neighborhood’s character, ultimately expressing satisfaction with the plans.

The board also discussed an application for an addition to a residential property, which sought to add a bedroom and an art studio to a four-bedroom house. This project included the installation of an elevator to accommodate a wheelchair-bound resident. The applicant plans to increase the addition’s width to meet accessibility needs, resulting in a modest increase in building coverage. The board expressed strong support for the project, recognizing its benefits for the residents and the design that blended with the existing structure.

Public comments played a role in the meeting. Brian Phillips supported the residential addition, emphasizing the project’s importance for accessibility. Health agent Judith Giorgio provided input on compliance with health regulations, adding credibility to the board’s decision-making process. The board members unanimously approved the application.

Additionally, the board considered a proposal for a new three-bedroom house on a lot previously containing a similar structure. The applicant presented plans for a septic system designed to protect groundwater and resource areas, along with environmental improvements such as native plantings.

In another application, the board reviewed a proposal to enlarge a non-conforming dwelling on Palmer Drive. This involved constructing a partial second-floor addition, which would remain non-conforming due to its proximity to property lines. The board acknowledged existing trees that would mitigate privacy concerns.

The meeting concluded with deliberations on a proposal for a modest addition to a dwelling, featuring a new second floor and additional windows. The board’s discussion centered on the architectural style and the proposal’s compatibility with neighboring properties. Opinions varied among board members, reflecting differing perspectives on the visual impact and design. Ultimately, the board decided to continue the discussion, allowing the applicants time to consider revisions.