At the forefront of the discussions was the application (number 24-11) for the construction of a swimming pool on Lenel Lane. Attorney William G. Lichfield, representing property owner Pamela Kindler, sought permission to enlarge, extend, and change non-conforming accessory structures on a lot that did not comply with current zoning requirements due to changes in land use regulations and flood map designations. The proposed changes included a playhouse, storage shed, and spa, as well as the relocation of exterior mechanical equipment. The desire to accommodate grandchildren was a notable aspect of the project. Correspondences from the Health Department and Conservation Agent supported the application with conditions, such as tree replacement and septic system plans. During deliberations, board members expressed support, although there were concerns about the shed’s relocation, the impact on oak trees, and FEMA compliance for the equipment due to the property’s location in a flood zone. Despite these reservations, the board closed the hearing and approved the application.

Another application that garnered attention was from Three Fins Coffee Roasters. Applicants Ronald Reic and another individual proposed incorporating a light industry and manufacturing operation for chocolate and cold brew coffee production within a restaurant coffee shop located in a general business zone. They outlined plans for renovating the space and addressed potential impacts on traffic flow, visual aesthetics, sewage disposal, noise, and litter. Concerns from a neighboring property owner about maintenance were acknowledged by the applicants, who agreed to necessary improvements. The board engaged in discussions on the proposal’s potential impacts, especially regarding outdoor dining, hours of operation, and noise from deliveries. The matter required further discussion and additional approvals from the planning board and historic business district commission, thus preventing a final decision at the meeting.

The board also considered an application from Robert and Julie D. Napalitano, who sought to demolish their existing dwelling on Scallop Terrace and construct a new one on their non-conforming lot within the coastal Conservancy District flood plain. The proposed new building coverage slightly exceeded the maximum allowed by zoning regulations. The board’s discussion focused on the non-conforming nature of the lot and the proposed dwelling, adherence to setback requirements, and the potential environmental impact within the coastal Conservancy District. Ultimately, the board unanimously approved the application, with special emphasis on ensuring that the development would not be detrimental to the neighborhood and would comply with zoning bylaws.

Furthermore, a homeowner and builder presented a revised plan for a property, which included a reduction in square footage and alterations to the garage, catwalk, and deck dimensions. The board discussed this plan’s compliance with zoning criteria, the impact on neighboring properties, and the appearance of various town committees. Concerns were raised about the house’s proximity to the property line and the presence of a generator on the deck, leading to a discussion about the potential impact on the neighborhood’s visual character.

Lastly, the board discussed a proposed increase in non-conforming nature related to a deck, debating its proximity to the property line and potential noise issues. A straw vote revealed majority support for the proposal under certain conditions, including the removal of a generator. Another application, seeking to enlarge a dwelling on a non-conforming lot, was presented by Bill Lichfield. The proposal complied with all dimensional requirements but required a special permit. This application was also favored by the neighborhood resident and involved discussions about utilities and the impact of the proposed addition on the neighborhood.

In addition to the property developments, the meeting featured unanimous approval of an application for renovations to an existing dwelling, which was supported by the homeowners association. The proposed improvements aimed to enhance the neighborhood aesthetically, with conditions related to construction activity and the cupola’s design.

The second unanimously approved application involved the enlargement and conversion of a pre-existing garage into habitable space. The applicant sought forgiveness for a conversion done by the previous owner without permits, which the Historic Commission had already approved due to the building’s age.