08:45The meeting commenced with the discussion of application number 25-017, submitted by Andrew and Allison Pelosi for their property on Cod Lane. Represented by Attorney William G. Lichfield, the Pelosis proposed an addition to their non-conforming dwelling on a non-conforming lot. The proposed addition would increase the building coverage from 11% to 14.9%, just under the 15% maximum allowed. Lichfield outlined the necessity for the addition, noting the dwelling’s inadequate space for the Pelosis’ family needs, particularly with two teenage sons. The expansion plan aimed to relocate the master bedroom to a different part of the house, providing necessary space while slightly improving the property’s setback from Cod Lane. The board unanimously approved the application, setting specific conditions for construction activities, such as restrictions on exterior work between June 30th and Labor Day.

21:48Following this, the board deliberated on the Kettle Taga Harbor Trust’s application to reconstruct a portion of an elevated stairway damaged by erosion. Raul Sardi from Cape Island Engineering presented the proposal, emphasizing the project’s environmental benefit by stabilizing the bank and preventing further erosion. The board recognized the importance of the repairs and unanimously approved the application after ensuring compliance with navigational safety and the Wetlands Protection Act.

30:21The meeting’s most discussion involved the Parsons Family Revocable Trust’s proposal. This application sought to demolish an existing dwelling to construct a new one on a non-conforming lot within a historic cottage colony. Attorney Bill Lichfield, representing the Parsons, highlighted the property’s historical significance and the family’s intention to maintain its character while updating one cottage for year-round living. Architect Diana Zaglio elaborated on the design, focusing on creating a functional space with an art studio for Pam Parsons. Despite non-conformities such as insufficient frontage and increased building coverage, the board viewed the proposal favorably, appreciating the effort to preserve the cottages’ historical aspect. The board ultimately approved the application, acknowledging the balance between respecting zoning regulations and the property’s unique history.

44:56Board members expressed varying opinions regarding the proposal’s compatibility with the neighborhood, particularly concerning the increased height of the new structure. Some members were concerned that the height might initially appear out of place but could integrate well over time, given the presence of other two-story homes in the area. Despite differing views, the consensus was that the design was attractive and aligned with the neighborhood’s character, leading to unanimous approval.

57:49The board also addressed an application for a property on Cove Hill Road, where owners Bill and Joanne Petri sought to construct an addition on their non-conforming dwelling. Presented by Thomas Moore, the proposal included a great room, mudroom addition, and a new front porch. The board noted that the addition would not alter the neighborhood’s character, receiving unanimous approval after confirming no objections from the public or health agent.

01:15:21Lastly, the board considered a special permit application for a property on Shane Drive, where Charles and Marily O’Connell proposed a small addition to accommodate a bathroom and laundry area. Bill Lichfield emphasized the necessity of the addition due to the owners’ aging and difficulty accessing the basement laundry. The board found the project consistent with the neighborhood and approved it unanimously, with conditions for managing construction activities.