The first notable discussion centered on the estate of Cathleen Lee’s application to demolish an existing structure and construct a new dwelling that would be non-conforming in terms of setback and building coverage. The applicant’s representative, William F. Riley, presented efforts to minimize the visual impact of the building and maintain neighborhood compatibility. The board engaged in a thorough deliberation, considering the increase in non-conformity and impact on neighboring properties, such as stormwater runoff and visual character. Differing views were expressed by the board members, some appreciating the efforts to minimize the impact, while others raised concerns about the size and scale of the proposed structure.

Another application involved a special permit for a new dwelling on Old Mail Road. The applicants argued that the proposed structure would not be more detrimental to the neighborhood and could potentially increase property values. The Board of Health had deemed the sewage disposal method adequate, and plans were in place to manage stormwater runoff. However, the potential removal of a 200-year-old tree and the setback of the proposed structure sparked debate among board members and public correspondence, with letters expressing both support and opposition.

The meeting also included a proposal for a property located on Old Harbor Road to alter and expand a non-conforming dwelling, which was discussed but continued as the filing had not been made with the Chatham Historical Commission (CHC). Similarly, an application for a property on Fox Hill Road proposed constructing a deck for accessibility purposes due to the steep slope around the property. The board reviewed several correspondences in support of the application and focused on the impact of the proposed changes on the neighborhood.

Furthermore, the board deliberated on an application for a dimensional variance to install a swimming pool. The applicant’s representative argued that the unique layout of the property posed a hardship and proposed conditions to mitigate concerns about noise and aesthetics. The board members asked questions regarding setback requirements and the feasibility of repositioning the pool. The hearing was closed after debate on the variance criteria.

Among other cases, the board unanimously approved a construction project on Knob Hill with conditions to limit construction during the summer and specific work hours. Additionally, the Chatham Dog Club LLC’s application to incorporate an overnight kennel into their existing dog care facility was discussed. The applicant proposed overnight boarding for existing clients with staff present 24 hours, addressing concerns about noise and traffic. The board engaged in a thorough discussion regarding the need and potential impact of this facility.

The application for a special permit for a kennel at a property in the industrial zone was another point of discussion. Attorney Jamie Norcross represented the applicant, focusing on providing overnight boarding for existing clientele. The board reviewed criteria for the special permit and correspondences from various stakeholders. Concerns about noise were raised during the public comment period, leading to the board requesting further discussion with the property owner and granting a continuance until the June 13th meeting.