Central to the meeting was the application for a comprehensive permit under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40B submitted by Penrose LLC. This proposal, which seeks several waivers from local zoning regulations, has been in the works since the town issued a request for proposals in February 2024. The site in question spans 2.95 acres in an R20 zoning district, and the development is designed to address the acute need for affordable housing in Chatham.

The proposal has garnered support from various town entities and external organizations, including the Cape Cod Commission, which praised the project’s alignment with community design goals and its response to the need for affordable housing. However, the project also faces opposition from residents concerned about its scale, environmental impact, and integration with the existing neighborhood.

Significant concerns were raised about the environmental implications of the project, specifically regarding the removal of trees. Friends of Trees emphasized the need to minimize disturbances to natural wooded areas, advocating for an alternative plan that would better preserve the site’s natural features.

Height and proximity of the proposed buildings were other issues discussed. Some residents argued that the height of the buildings—up to 35 feet—would overshadow existing one-story structures, urging the board to consider reducing the height to align better with local zoning bylaws. Others expressed concerns about the project’s potential to create a “wall of buildings” that could negatively impact the character of the neighborhood.

Despite these concerns, there was notable support for the Penrose proposal, with numerous letters and testimonials highlighting the need for affordable housing in Chatham. Supporters argued that the development would provide much-needed accommodations for essential workers, such as teachers and emergency personnel, who currently struggle to find affordable living options on Cape Cod.

The architectural and landscaping aspects of the project were also thoroughly discussed. Modifications to the design have been made in response to community feedback, including adjustments to building heights and parking configurations. The developers emphasized their commitment to maintaining energy efficiency standards and incorporating native species in the landscaping to enhance the site’s aesthetic and ecological value.

Traffic and pedestrian safety were additional points of discussion. The board considered suggestions for improving safety measures, such as the installation of pedestrian-activated beacons and enhanced crosswalks. The fire department’s requirements for emergency vehicle access were a key consideration, with the proposal meeting the minimum width requirements for traffic circulation on the site.

The Zoning Board is tasked with navigating these challenges as they move forward with the project discussions.