A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the discussion of a proposed wildlife clinic at the farm. The value of the service provided by the clinic was recognized, but concerns were voiced about its impact on open space and the need for a permanent location. Alternatives, such as placing the clinic in a more industrial area on Hunt Road, were mentioned. The possibility of conducting a site visit to stake out the proposed areas was also brought up to better visualize the impact on the property, including view and wetland areas. The committee showed general support for the clinic but acknowledged the necessity for further approvals and the importance of preventing pedestrian access to conserve buffer zones.

Public comments on the wildlife clinic reflected both support for its alignment with the goal of preserving nature and concerns about the impact of events on the local wildlife. Individuals also expressed a strong desire for maintaining the open space and preserving the natural beauty of the property.

The Task Force also delved into the legal and procedural requirements for leasing town-owned land, which would be needed for the wildlife clinic and other long-term projects. It was noted that town meeting approval and a competitive bidding process are prerequisites for these leases. The process for obtaining preservation restrictions and conservation land was explained, highlighting the various levels of approval required and the lengthy timeline that such endeavors could entail.

Another proposal that garnered attention was the creation of a pollinator garden. The committee expressed positive sentiments towards the garden, making a definitive recommendation in its favor.

The meeting also covered the potential agricultural use of the land. The debate oscillated between utilizing a six-acre parcel for farming to maintain the town’s agricultural heritage and leasing it for commercial use to generate revenue for conservation and agricultural projects. While some advocated for preserving the farmland, others considered the financial implications of leasing the land. The committee recommended using the land for hay production but acknowledged the need for further investigation into the suitability of the property for a nursery and the details of an accessible trail and parking area.

Additionally, the question of whether to establish temporary gravel parking to provide access to the field was discussed, with the Department of Public Works (DPW) being mentioned in relation to looking at temporary parking areas for the site. Concerns about the terrain being steep, rocky, and wet were raised when considering the area near the house for potential agricultural or public use. The majority of the committee recommended agricultural use for the Hunt Road piece, though the condition of a brook in the area and its effects on farming capability were noted.

The Chelmsford Cultural Council’s support for creating public event space on the property was a highlight, emphasizing the potential of hosting various art forms and community events. Additionally, a representative from the Boy Scouts advocated for unstructured space to accommodate large events.

The letter highlighted a preference for limited structures such as a shed and porta-potties and opposed renting or selling the land to non-farming commercial entities, adding concerns about dust and gravel on the roadway.