05:47The board prioritized discussions on the zoning reclassification at Kate’s Corner, considering the introduction of a new zone termed CB Light, which would encompass elements of both commercial and residential zones. The meeting delved into the practical application of dimensional requirements for this new zone, debating building height limits and coverage percentages to stimulate a gradual transition from residential to industrial zones. The board’s consensus was to maintain the three-story height limit, aligning with the existing RB zone, and to adjust the coverage percentage to 30%, promoting increased density.

There was an in-depth examination of the Community Enhancement Investment Overlay District (SEID) as a tool to provide flexibility for non-conforming lots. This overlay could facilitate redevelopment by allowing deviations from zoning requirements in exchange for community benefits such as improved architectural designs. The board considered the SEID’s strategic use, not just for relief but to address properties historically non-compliant due to past development patterns.

Concerns were raised regarding the SEID’s tangible benefits, as recent projects like those on Chelmsford Street did not require its dimensional relief. This prompted a broader discussion about the overlay’s applicability throughout the town, using Kate’s Corner as a test case for mathematical analyses to determine redevelopment potential. The board highlighted the need for re-evaluating dimensional requirements to align with SEID goals.

Public input was solicited, with community members suggesting a methodical approach to applying new zoning regulations based on unique zone characteristics. The conversation acknowledged that large setbacks could render some lots unusable, emphasizing the need to consider existing conditions and intended future developments.

55:15A separate topic of significant interest related to offsite mitigation efforts, specifically concerning a pedestrian bridge project at Cushing Place. The board recognized that better communication and engagement with DPW could prevent similar issues in future projects.

01:16:45The conversation transitioned to legal and financial considerations, including the potential requirement for developers to post performance bonds for offsite improvements. Additionally, there was a proposal to revisit the Payment in Lieu of Obligation (PYO) program, adjusting contributions to reflect rising construction costs and discourage exemptions from affordable housing obligations.

The board also addressed a bridge replacement project on Westford Street and Gorm Street, noting potential disruptions due to construction timelines. Concerns were raised about limited public awareness of these projects, emphasizing the need for better communication with residents about upcoming developments.

01:23:50During the meeting, updates from the Conservation Commission were provided, focusing on watershed analyses and mitigation strategies for flood-prone areas. The board discussed ongoing projects and bylaws, including a lighting bylaw intended for the Finance Committee’s consideration.