Chelsea Planning Board Approves Liquor License Upgrade and Discusses Redevelopment on Herd Street

The Chelsea Planning Board held a meeting to address several developments, including the approval of a liquor license upgrade for a local business and a discussion about a proposed educational facility on Herd Street. These topics were supplemented by conversations around transportation safety and infrastructure improvements within the city.

01:42The meeting began with the board’s approval of a special permit request allowing Broadway Variety 2 on Eastern Avenue to upgrade from a beer and wine license to a full liquor license. The business’s owner, Surrender Soni, represented by counsel Rebecca Edmonson Cororum, sought the change due to the store’s long-standing operation without incidents since 2015. The board unanimously approved the request, noting that the store’s operating hours would remain constant.

05:42Following this, the board engaged in an extensive discussion about the redevelopment project on Herd Street, proposed by David Gamble on behalf of La Collaborativa. The project aims to transform a vacant three-unit residential building into a four-story structure dedicated to workforce training, vocational education, and small business development programs. Gamble emphasized the inclusion of community input, highlighting the “placita,” a public space designed to foster interaction between the new building and existing structures.

16:28The project design includes transit accessibility due to the nearby Silver Line stop, parking relief solutions, and measures to mitigate floodplain issues. Civil engineer Bill Maher plans for integrating existing utilities and managing stormwater through permeable materials and urban gardening strategies. The board discussed the project’s nonconformance with certain zoning requirements, such as minimum lot size and sideyard setbacks. However, the design incorporates stepbacks to harmonize the building’s height and profile with nearby triple-decker residential structures.

25:17Public engagement was a componet of the discussion, with numerous community meetings leading to a generally positive reception. However, concerns were raised regarding the building’s modern design, calling for more traditional architectural elements to blend with the neighborhood’s aesthetic. Some residents expressed excitement about the educational programs, while others voiced concerns about noise, operational hours, and traffic congestion, particularly given Herd Street’s narrow, one-way configuration.

35:07The Planning Board acknowledged these concerns. Discussions also addressed the lack of a loading dock, with plans for material management through a garage door and forklifts. Public comments included significant opposition from a resident of 54 Herd Street, who criticized the transformation of the area into a business zone and raised concerns about inadequate stormwater management and parking arrangements.

01:26:39Transportation safety and infrastructure enhancements were also discussion points during the meeting. The board reviewed data from the “Safe Streets for All” project, focusing on reducing traffic fatalities through improved street design. Conversations included the integration of bike lanes, pedestrian safety measures, and the potential for pedestrian bridges at busy intersections. The board explored alternative transportation methods, such as a ferry service, to enhance connectivity across Chelsea.

01:46:19The possibility of extending the Silver Line was discussed, though funding remains a challenge. Discussions highlighted the importance of a cohesive bike lane network and improving transit accessibility, particularly for those without vehicular access. The board emphasized the need for strategic planning to address Chelsea’s transportation challenges and enhance safety and connectivity for residents.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: