The most contentious topic of the meeting revolved around the appointment of Leah Greener Kennedy as a consultant. Rick Short, a Cherry Hill resident, was particularly vocal in his opposition, criticizing Kennedy’s perceived radical views. Short questioned why Kennedy was chosen out of thousands of available consultants, citing the complex challenges facing education today, such as systemic racism and climate change. “I hope you vote no! Take a stand once!” Short exclaimed, expressing his frustration with the board’s perceived support of divisive narratives.

In response to these criticisms, the superintendent clarified that Kennedy’s role would focus solely on the World Language Program, distancing her from special education or controversial curricular initiatives. The board proceeded with the action agenda, approving several appointments, including George Guy as the director of elementary education and affirmative action officer, a motion that passed unanimously.

Funding issues also dominated the meeting, with community members highlighting the district’s financial struggles. Jeff Podowitz raised alarm over the misclassification of the World Language Program under special education, which he argued could distort spending reports. Podowitz pointed to a historical shortfall in state aid, where Cherry Hill received less than expected. He warned that the projected funding for the 2026-2027 school year could jeopardize the district’s financial stability amidst rising enrollment, questioning, “Where the heck are we gonna pay for this?” Podowitz called for a reassessment of how funding is reported to prevent harm to the community and educational quality.

In addition to these financial concerns, Alana Yaris, chair of the Fair Funding Committee, invited the board and public to participate in upcoming meetings to explore new strategies for engaging with state funding.

The meeting also saw discussions around curriculum and policy. Max Kukovka, a new student representative, advocated for a review of Policy 143.2, which currently requires student representatives from the same school to alternate meetings. Kukovka argued that this policy impeded effective collaboration and proposed allowing both representatives to attend meetings simultaneously.

The board addressed several policy approvals, including those related to harassment investigations and attendance areas, which passed despite some dissent. A strategic plan was also approved, though it faced opposition, with three members voting against it.

Additional public comments reflected ongoing concerns about the district’s affiliations and educational practices. Richard, a long-time attendee, criticized the district for allegedly allowing “radical consultants” and called for distancing from divisive teaching practices. Meanwhile, Dr. Sarah Jocelyn congratulated Mr. Guy on his new role and requested a public presentation of the district’s Comprehensive Equity Plan, emphasizing the importance of transparency.