Cherry Hill School Board Faces Tough Budget Decisions Amid Community Concerns on Safety and Funding

The Cherry Hill School Board meeting was largely focused on the adoption of the 2025-2026 budget, which brought to light issues around funding, tax increases, and the financial management of the district. The board approved a budget that saw a reduction in classroom-related costs but faced increased expenses in employee benefits and transportation. With a $5.2 million increase in taxes and a nearly $4 million reduction in state aid, the board found itself navigating a complex financial landscape while striving to maintain educational quality. The meeting also highlighted community concerns over safety, funding for preschool expansion, and the emotional toll of recent tragedies within the school community.

09:14The budget discussion revealed a mixed financial outlook for the Cherry Hill School District. A decrease in state aid, particularly the loss of equalization aid, posed challenges, although the state’s hold harmless policy mitigated further losses. This shortfall in state funding necessitated a reliance on local taxes, which were raised by $5.2 million to cover the budget gap. The board’s decision to increase taxes underscored a broader debate about the sustainability of funding education through local property taxes. This reliance was a point of contention among board members, some of whom expressed regret over the necessity of the tax hikes, while others emphasized the importance of fiscal responsibility and strategic planning.

24:57The meeting delved into the implications of the budget, which included the addition of new educational positions like a math coach and interventionists, while middle school restructuring led to the elimination of 28 positions. This restructuring was a response to financial constraints and aimed at creating efficiencies within the district. The board discussed efforts to reassign staff to vacant positions. Community members voiced concerns during the public comment period, addressing the impact of the budget on services like transportation and special education. Questions were raised about the district’s ability to maintain these services amid funding cuts, particularly around Title I and special education programs.

02:24:32Safety concerns within the district also emerged as a significant topic. Public comments revealed frustration over perceived delays in implementing safety improvements, such as door replacements and bus safety measures. The board acknowledged the need for enhanced security measures, with funds reportedly allocated for these purposes. Yet, some community members expressed dissatisfaction with the pace of progress, citing incidents of unsafe conditions and the lack of visible improvements.

50:07Preschool funding was another focal point, as the board discussed the challenges of expanding preschool services amid financial constraints. The state aid for preschool expansion covered general education costs but fell short in areas like transportation, placing additional financial strain on the district. The board recognized the efficiency gains from economies of scale in the expanded program but faced questions from the community about the sustainability of funding and the impact on overall educational resources.

01:52:47The meeting also addressed recent tragedies that have deeply affected the school community: the death of a third-grade student and the principal of Joyce Kilmer Elementary School. Board members and the superintendent expressed profound sadness and emphasized the community’s resilience in supporting one another through these difficult times. The emotional toll of these losses was a notable reminder of the broader challenges facing the district, both financial and social.

38:56Calls for greater community involvement in governance and advocacy for fair state funding were echoed, with some members urging the public to participate in efforts to influence funding policies.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: