A development during the meeting was the approval of an artificial intelligence policy, which aims to guide the responsible use of AI technologies within the county. Two representatives, Arc and Rory, presented the policy, emphasizing AI’s potential to improve efficiency in tasks such as data analysis and text generation. Rory illustrated how AI could streamline processes like GIS day resolution production, while also highlighting the importance of maintaining data accuracy and protecting sensitive information. The policy is designed to be adaptable to technological advancements. Commissioner Ebinger noted the policy had been reviewed by a committee and underscored its importance in setting guidelines for AI use. The motion to approve the policy passed unanimously.

Budgetary concerns dominated the meeting, particularly regarding social services. The board delved into the complexities of funding out-of-home placements for children, which have seen costs rise despite a decrease in the number of children requiring such services. The Families First Preservation Services Act has impacted the county’s ability to receive federal reimbursement, placing additional financial pressure on local resources. Efforts to certify current facilities as Qualified Residential Treatment Programs (QRTP) are ongoing, but complexities in licensing with the Department of Corrections and the Department of Human Services have posed challenges. Commissioner Krabbenhoft emphasized the need for collective advocacy with the Association of Minnesota Counties to address these funding challenges at the state level. The discussion revealed the financial burden of placing children in out-of-county facilities, which can cost between $1,800 and $2,000 per day, further straining the county’s budget.

In addition to social services, the board examined the budget for civil commitment-related services, which includes sex offender placements and regional treatment centers. These services have historically exceeded budget projections due to the unpredictability of court-ordered placements and the high costs associated with long-term stays. The county’s responsibility for these services is set to increase, with legislative changes raising the county’s financial share to 40%. The board recognized the need for a more equitable funding model, advocating for changes at the state level to alleviate the financial burden on the county.

The meeting also highlighted potential savings in health insurance costs, with a proposal to transition from Blue Cross Blue Shield to Medicica for the years 2026 and 2027. The insurance committee recommended the switch, citing significant savings with Medicica’s proposal, which includes a negative 12% premium increase for 2026 and a cap for 2027 that could save the county approximately $783,000 annually. This decision followed a competitive RFP process, where Medicica’s offer stood out against other proposals. The proposed plan also includes a $50,000 wellness credit and an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) at no additional cost, providing further benefits to county employees. A motion to approve the transition to Medicica passed unanimously.

The board’s discussions extended to solid waste management, with concerns about the financial implications of the resource recovery facility and the associated tipping fees. The withdrawal of Moorhead from a contract has introduced uncertainties, prompting a review of the solid waste budget. The board is considering a reduction in the special assessment, which would decrease the per-parcel fee for single-residential homes. However, rising operational costs, including equipment purchases and staffing needs, necessitate careful budget adjustments. The board acknowledged these challenges and emphasized the importance of transparent communication with residents to minimize the financial impact on the community.