In addition to the school resource officer agreement, the board considered a variety of budgetary matters. Notably, discussions around the land records department focused on the allocation of $105,000 from the recorders compliance fund for 2026. This funding aligns with historical practices and is intended to support essential departmental needs, including tax system maintenance and software for the assessor’s office. Maintaining compliance with state regulations is crucial, as non-compliance could necessitate hiring additional staff, an unbudgeted expense. The board emphasized the importance of managing these funds prudently to ensure ongoing compliance and operational efficiency.

Another topic revolved around new judicial security legislation, which necessitates setting a $75 fee per notice to protect district court judges’ addresses. This legislation introduces an address protection program, requiring extensive administrative coordination across departments. Commissioners discussed the potential expansion of this initiative to include other public officials, which could impact revenue from public record inquiries. The board acknowledged the administrative burden this legislation imposes and the need to develop an effective internal framework to manage these changes.

In the realm of online real estate records, the board approved a fee increase to offset rising costs associated with software and cybersecurity measures. The new structure includes a flat fee of 20 cents per minute for overages and an increase in print costs from 35 to 40 cents per page. These adjustments aim to recoup operational expenses without generating profit.

Budget presentations from various departments were another highlight of the meeting. Similarly, adjustments in the budget for road maintenance and traffic supplies were discussed, with a focus on ensuring efficiency and cost-effectiveness in light of shifting financial landscapes.

The highway administration budget was scrutinized, with discussions around increasing workman’s compensation and equipment repair costs. These budgetary considerations underscore the board’s ongoing efforts to balance fiscal responsibility with the need to maintain essential services and infrastructure.

In committee reports, updates on the diversion authority and settlement agreements were of particular note. The resolution of nearly $400 million in claims related to the diversion project, with a settlement amounting to $57 million, was a focal point. This settlement aims to address disputes and ensure the timely progression of the project.