The marina project, a topic of public interest, was brought to the forefront by resident Dave Nestrom. He urged the commission to heed the community’s growing discontent, referencing previous instances where public opposition led to policy reversals. Nestrom highlighted conflicting information about the marina’s inclusion in the budget, prompting a commissioner to clarify that the budget for 2026 had not been finalized and that the feasibility study was merely a preliminary step to assess the project’s viability.

The debate revealed a split among commissioners. They expressed frustration over the idea of canceling it, noting the financial resources already invested. Another commissioner echoed this sentiment, pointing out that the study was a wise use of funds, especially given the city’s tight budget constraints.

Despite this support, there were calls for more transparency regarding the study’s contract details. A commissioner suggested that presenting these details at future meetings might ease resident concerns.

Public comments on the marina project were diverse. Some speakers supported the continuation of the feasibility study, citing its potential as a revenue generator despite skepticism about the project’s eventual realization. One commenter questioned the classification of the discussion as a “special presentation,” arguing that it should fit into general public commentary rather than a specific agenda segment.

Attention then shifted to the financial implications of Ordinance 1689, which proposed amendments to sections of the Cocoa Beach Code of Ordinances related to the National Flood Insurance Program. These changes aim to maintain or improve the city’s Community Rating System Class 8 rating, thereby impacting flood insurance rates for residents. One commissioner expressed concern about potential increases in flood insurance rates, emphasizing the need for clarity from development services on the financial effects of the changes. A staff member reassured that the amendments were primarily linguistic adjustments necessary to preserve the current rating and prevent a downgrade that could raise insurance rates.

The commission unanimously voted to approve the first reading of Ordinance 1689.

The meeting also addressed the issue of e-bike safety on shared pathways, with a proposal to adopt stenciling to delineate zones for pedestrians and cyclists. This suggestion received broad support as a cost-effective measure to promote safety and prevent accidents.

Additionally, concerns about recent storm damage along the beach were raised, with questions about collaborative efforts with Cape Canaveral to address erosion before sea turtle season. This topic underscored the necessity for timely action to protect the local environment.

During the public comments, resident Angela Cob proposed organizing a trash pickup event during a surfing event at the pier. The city manager supported the idea, offering resources to facilitate the cleanup effort and suggesting promotion through the city’s online platforms.

The meeting concluded with budget discussions and the approval of items on the consent agenda, including a cost-saving dredging project at the 400 Channel. The commission highlighted the successful reduction in project costs, initially estimated to exceed one million dollars, as a step in managing public funds.