Public comment dominated the meeting as residents discussed the proposed immigration resolution. Chris, a resident, argued against revisiting the resolution, citing strong opposition among community members. He emphasized the need to respect and enforce legal immigration while remaining friendly towards those who comply with the law. Chris warned that prioritizing the resolution could hinder efforts to address financial challenges, such as high energy bills and a potential budget override, referencing board member Forest’s statement about a looming “financial perfect storm.”

Cheryl echoed Chris’s sentiments, urging the board to dismiss further discussions on the resolution, which she believed conflated legal and illegal immigration. She expressed concern over potential influence from activists and emphasized the importance of respecting the legal immigration process. Meanwhile, Tom Sullivan and Joe Glenn contributed to the discourse, highlighting the divide among residents regarding the resolution and stressing the need for transparency in school budget allocations.

In contrast, Susan Gregory Davis, representing Yarmouth for Everyone, supported the resolution, advocating for a message of care and acceptance for all residents. Although disappointed by the controversy, Davis announced plans to place the resolution directly on the ballot for a vote on May 19, 2026, bypassing the select board. She encouraged the board to support this democratic approach.

The meeting also addressed the town’s financial landscape, particularly concerning the school budget. A tentative budget of approximately $86 million was presented, leading to a proposed 10% assessment increase. Concerns were raised about the potential need for a budget override, with estimates ranging from one to three million dollars. The board expressed hope that the school committee could identify substantial savings to prevent an override.

Amidst financial discussions, Joe Glenn highlighted Yarmouth’s disproportionate contribution to the school budget, paying 70% without adequate representation on the school committee. He advocated for a more equitable representation model, referencing a past configuration that included more Yarmouth members.

The meeting also explored potential developments for the Madakis property, envisioning a multi-use sports complex and housing. Alternative proposals considered various configurations, including a sports facility with residential units and community amenities. The board acknowledged the need for public-private partnerships to effectively utilize the site, given financial constraints and competing town needs.

Additionally, the board reviewed the draft 2026 Hazard Mitigation Plan, a critical document for addressing environmental challenges. The plan, funded through a hazard mitigation grant program, aims to reduce risks from natural disasters through strategic actions. It identifies vulnerable populations, essential facilities, and potential financial impacts from hazards like inland flooding and coastal erosion. The board approved sending the draft to MEMA and FEMA for review, recognizing the importance of updating the plan every five years.

Infrastructure and community amenities were also on the agenda, with discussions about ambulance and public works fees. Proposed increases in ambulance fees and mattress disposal charges were considered, with no public comments received. The board also addressed the need for comprehensive studies on school infrastructure and enrollment trends, particularly in light of declining public school enrollment and potential consolidations.

The meeting concluded with administrative updates and acknowledgments, including a resignation from the Tony Kent Arena Board and upcoming agenda items for the next session. The board adjourned after discussing the consent agenda, which included acknowledgments for community events and initiatives.