The meeting’s focal point was a proposal to develop a multifamily dwelling on a uniquely shaped lot on Edgar Street. The applicant sought variances to accommodate three townhouse units, which would surpass the standard density allowed in the area. The proposal aimed to introduce a modern housing option in a neighborhood characterized by single-family homes and limited multifamily developments. However, the triangular shape of the lot posed challenges, requiring the applicant to request modifications related to setbacks and density.

Residents voiced strong opposition, citing concerns over exacerbated parking issues and stormwater management inadequacies. One resident highlighted the historical context, referencing a zoning board variance granted in 1956 for a single-family home on the same lot, underscoring long-standing concerns about inadequate space. The potential increase in density raised fears about the neighborhood’s ability to accommodate more vehicles, particularly given the narrowness of Edgar Street and existing parking difficulties. A resident pointed to police records showing 29 parking tickets issued in recent weeks, emphasizing the street’s existing congestion.

The applicant defended the proposal by arguing that the development would not impact traffic or noise levels more than single-family homes would. They suggested that the townhouses align with modern multifamily housing trends, providing an aesthetically pleasing alternative to more densely packed apartment buildings. Despite these assurances, board members and residents remained skeptical, emphasizing the need for thorough consideration of neighborhood dynamics and infrastructure capacity.

Stormwater management also emerged as a contentious issue. Residents expressed concerns about the adequacy of the proposed drainage system, particularly during heavy rainfall. A resident shared geological data indicating the potential for overflow and flooding, exacerbated by previous weather events like Hurricane Floyd and Superstorm Sandy. The applicant’s proposal included a four-tank drywell system intended to manage stormwater, though residents questioned its capacity to handle significant rainfalls, fearing it might worsen existing water runoff problems.

In addition to density and drainage concerns, the meeting addressed logistical challenges related to construction and parking. The applicant’s plans included eight parking spaces for the three-bedroom units, with the possibility of a ninth space contingent on garbage area placements. However, residents doubted whether this arrangement would suffice, particularly given the potential for attic spaces to be converted into additional bedrooms, thereby increasing demand for parking. The discussion also touched on the potential encroachment of construction activities onto neighboring properties, raising apprehensions about noise, dust, and the safety of children in the area.

Members stressed the importance of ensuring compliance with zoning regulations, particularly regarding density and stormwater management, to maintain neighborhood stability and infrastructure integrity. The board decided to carry the application to a future meeting, allowing time for further investigation and consideration of the issues raised.