The primary topic of the meeting was the renovation and management of the town’s elementary school garden, which currently features raised beds and raspberry rows. Participants expressed a desire to revitalize the garden by reconstructing the raised beds and introducing new plantings like apple trees and high bush blueberries. This initiative aims for a fall implementation, but concerns were raised about the timing of harvests, particularly during summer vacations, when families might be unavailable to tend to or harvest from the garden. The conversation underscored the need for leadership and a supervisory role to effectively guide the garden’s maintenance and ensure consistent care, especially during periods when school is not in session.

The selectboard explored the potential involvement of local educators and community members to spearhead spring initiatives. There was also a call for a modest budget to cover the costs associated with plant materials and improvements, with a suggested amount of around $500. The discussion recalled past successes, such as a strawberry planting initiative, and emphasized the importance of engagement and pride fostered by such projects.

The meeting also delved into the Community Preservation Committee’s role in funding various local projects, including modifications to the application process for agricultural preservation. There was a consensus that applicants should now submit applications directly, though assistance would still be available for those in need. A specific Agricultural Preservation Restriction (APR) application was reviewed, involving a tract of land across from Hurley E Field. This land, which spans approximately 31 acres, was assessed at a significant value loss when development rights were considered. The board discussed the implications of the APR, noting its permanency and alignment with the former landowner’s family’s wishes.

In addition to garden and funding discussions, the selectboard addressed the design and placement of Right to Farm signs, recognizing their importance in raising awareness of local farming practices. Five potential locations were identified for these signs, including strategic spots near the school and the reservoir. The signs’ design and dimensions were approved previously; however, there was some uncertainty regarding the associated production costs. The committee discussed potential funding sources to cover these expenses, noting that the original quote for five signs was approximately $1,220, while three signs with design costs were about $970. The board considered tapping into the highway budget or general funds to finance additional signs and emphasized the need for a consistent budget for future communication initiatives.

Further discussions centered around potential projects for the center school, with inquiries about using the site for a community garden. Concerns about the building’s future, including the possibility of its sale or demolition, were raised. Ideas for repurposing the building included transforming it into a community space such as a coffee shop or bookstore, but participants acknowledged the financial investment required for restoration.