The most notable topic discussed was the variance request by Ross Stagberg for an accessory structure on his property along Double Track Lake. The 12×20 structure, positioned only 25 feet from the ordinary high water level, violated the Cook County Zoning Ordinance, which mandates a 100-foot setback for structures on recreational development lakes. The structure had been constructed without necessary permits, as discovered during a 2025 enforcement review by the county’s land services department.

The board considered detailed findings, including aerial imagery and technical memos from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the Cook County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD). Both agencies highlighted the ecological importance of maintaining vegetative buffers along the shoreline to protect water quality, particularly given recent cyanobacteria blooms and declining water quality trends in Double Track Lake. The DNR specifically recommended denying the variance, arguing that the property offered alternative building locations compliant with zoning regulations, and that granting the variance could set a precedent for further non-compliant developments within the shore impact zone.

Ross Stagberg defended the placement of the structure, arguing that existing features such as a pea gravel bed and berms mitigated water runoff into the lake. He also pointed out the surrounding wetlands, which he claimed served as natural barriers. Public comments included suggestions to further enhance water filtration by planting additional vegetation, which Stagberg appeared open to considering.

The board members deliberated extensively, referencing water clarity data showing a 30% decline over 25 years in Devil Track Lake, and expressed concerns that granting the variance would undermine shoreland regulations meant to protect water quality. They concluded that the variance did not meet the required standards for approval and that no unique circumstances justified the deviation. Ultimately, the board unanimously voted to deny the variance, emphasizing the necessity of upholding zoning regulations and protecting the lake’s environmental integrity.

In contrast, the board approved a variance request from Carl and Melanda Schmidtz for modifications to their non-conforming cabin on Popular Lake. The proposed changes included enclosing a covered porch, expanding the foundation, and adding a screen porch and deck extensions. The existing cabin, built in 1972, is located outside the shore impact zone, and the variance request adhered to the property’s existing footprint, meeting specific conditions outlined in the zoning ordinance.

The SWCD provided a memo indicating declining water quality trends in Popular Lake, urging consideration of environmental impacts in new structures and modifications.

The property owners expressed their intention to make the cabin their permanent residence, emphasizing the need for upgrades.

The board members appreciated the modest nature of the proposed expansions, viewing them as a reasonable approach to updating an aging structure without increasing its footprint. They acknowledged the effective reworking of conditions concerning drainage and the commitment to enhancing surrounding vegetation. The variance was approved unanimously, with the board emphasizing the importance of balancing necessary improvements with environmental stewardship.