The commission’s approval of the IUP for the tent campsites followed a discussion about zoning compatibility and community impact. The site, which is currently undeveloped, does not fit within the explicitly permitted or conditional uses for the R1 zoning classification. Eric Pierce, representing the applicants, detailed the campsites, which will host up to four individuals per tent and include a primary tent measuring 16 by 20 feet. The proposal sparked a dialogue about the necessity of aligning with the comprehensive land plan and neighborhood compatibility.

Concerns centered around access to the undeveloped property, water sourcing for the bathhouse, and the condition of the access road. Commissioners noted the proximity of a stream course. The water supply was confirmed to be sourced from a nearby residence, with annual testing mandated by the Minnesota Department of Health for vacation rental licenses. The commission ultimately agreed on a three-year timeline for the IUP, emphasizing periodic evaluation and the stipulation that the permit would expire upon the property’s sale. Six conditions accompanied the approval, including regulatory compliance and the establishment of wastewater facilities prior to operations.

The meeting also transitioned to the Board of Adjustment’s consideration of a variance request from Glenn and Rita Helguson. The couple sought to construct a covered screen porch and deck on their Caribou Lake property, which would encroach on the required shoreline setback. The structure, originally built in 1938, sits 88 feet from the shoreline, while the zoning ordinance mandates a 100-foot setback. Public comments were largely in favor, with neighbors appreciating the proposal’s alignment with the existing cabin’s character and the tasteful nature of the addition.

The board weighed the Helgusons’ practical difficulties, considering their need for accessibility due to age and mobility challenges. The applicants highlighted their desire for a single-level addition to enjoy outdoor meals sheltered from mosquitoes and rain. The existing property’s historic value and the minimal environmental impact of the proposal were noted, with conditions including stormwater management and vegetation maintenance being recommended.

The conversation extended to another variance request involving a property in the Resort Commercial Residential (RCR) zone. The owner sought to reduce the side yard setback from 50 feet to 25 feet to accommodate a primary dwelling on a substandard lot. The board acknowledged the property’s unique circumstances and the outdated nature of current zoning regulations, which do not reflect contemporary land use patterns. Comments from adjacent property owners and the absence of objections from county departments informed the discussion.

The board found the request consistent with the comprehensive land use goals and zoning ordinance, emphasizing redevelopment and the preservation of natural resources. The applicant’s long-standing connection to the property and the reasonable nature of the variance, given neighboring development patterns, were decisive factors. The board unanimously approved the variance with conditions, recognizing the practical difficulties and aligning with zoning intentions.