The meeting’s most significant item was the approval of a local historic designation and a certificate of appropriateness for a property on University Drive. Built in 1939, the property is an early example of the neoclassical style prevalent in Coral Gables. The board heard a comprehensive presentation detailing the architectural features and historical context of the property, emphasizing its importance within the community’s evolving architectural landscape.

The property, designed by Upton Euing for Dr. Odin Schaefer, transitioned through various architectural periods, representing a shift from the Mediterranean revival styles to contemporary trends of the late 1930s. The board considered the property’s historical integrity and the potential for future modifications under a proposed certificate of appropriateness. The commission expressed unanimous support for the designation, citing the building’s unique contribution to the city’s heritage.

The approval of a certificate of appropriateness followed, allowing for specific alterations to the residence. An architect associated with the project presented the proposed changes, which included a two-story addition and a freestanding auxiliary structure. The design aimed to respect the original structure’s height and massing while addressing modern needs. The architect assured the commission that the modifications would maintain the home’s historical character, focusing on enhancing connectivity between the indoor and outdoor spaces.

During the meeting, the commission also discussed a proposal for a property on Alcazar Avenue, another property with historical significance. The architect presented a design strategy that integrated strong entrance features and various room configurations to maintain the home’s character.

The commission deliberated on the driveway configuration for a property on Alcazar Avenue, emphasizing the need to balance functional parking solutions with the residence’s visual appeal. The board approved the proposed design, including conditions to limit driveway access to a single curb cut.

Another prominent discussion revolved around 1021 Hardy Road, a site with ongoing code enforcement issues. The city had taken steps to stabilize the property, but concerns about water intrusion affecting neighboring properties persisted. Residents expressed frustration over the city’s handling of the situation, citing a lack of communication and transparency. They emphasized the impact of the property’s neglect on their homes, calling for more proactive measures from city officials.

Residents voiced concerns over a proposed terrace on Hardy Road, highlighting potential privacy and safety issues. The commission acknowledged the resident’s concerns, noting the importance of addressing the impact on neighboring properties. The resident criticized the approval process.

The meeting also addressed the status of the Biltmore Hotel and the gondola building. The Biltmore Hotel’s progress on code compliance was reviewed, with concerns about the lack of advancements. The commission discussed the potential relocation of the gondola building, emphasizing the need to preserve historical elements in any new construction. The board debated whether to incorporate these elements into a new structure or maintain them separately, reflecting differing perspectives on historical preservation.

As the meeting concluded, new business included the election of board officers, with Mr. Maxwell continuing as chair and Miss D as vice chair. The city attorney announced a training session on ethics and compliance for board members, emphasizing the importance of understanding their responsibilities in preserving the city’s architectural heritage.